Tiger1996 wrote:So, I don't like to hear for example that Hotchkiss is too hard to pentrate unless it's a balance issue or that Pz4s should be easier penetrated anyhow etc.
Wolf even hasn't agreed removing the flank speed from Tigers when I asked so although it would be more realistic.. simply because Tigers are the most expensive in their tier right now!
Not to mention that the same way someone else could then ask that 50mm paks should deal more damage against Greyhound... And that KT should be never penetrated from the front by 17p, would that be fine for the pvp balance I wonder?
This is no argument. Just because one idea was not approved, doesn't mean that some other idea won't be approved.
Tiger1996 wrote:Also the Diamler could actually beat the Stug if it ever manages to keep flanking.
Not talking about Stug
Tiger1996 wrote:Hotchkiss has 37mm gun, the AT gun version of this thing does have some very low chances to seldomly kill the Recce by just a single one shot sometimes, so.. why shouldn't the Hotchkiss be capable of also doing this? Or is it a balance issue somehow??!! Killing the Hotchkiss has now become too difficult nowadays or what??
You are wrong. Axis pak 36 and 37 mm APX SA18/38 gun of Hotchkiss are entirely different guns.
Tiger1996 wrote:PIATs however weren't made to reliably penetrate Pz4s at all specifically from the front.. as its main purpose was to hit from the above or the rear in order to immobilize or deal some crit damage... So, it's just fine.
Excause me?
Before you say something try to find out some source:
The weapon had a monstrous kick. On another occasion in Italy, a British soldier fired his PIAT from the shoulder at a Panther tank. The recoil knocked the soldier on his behind, but he got his tank. “Within its limitations,” as one authoritative weapons encyclopedia put it, “the PIAT was a startlingly effective weapon.” However, that opinion was not universally shared by the men who had to use it.
http://warfarehistorynetwork.com/daily/wwii/ordnance-the-british-piat-projector-infantry-anti-tank-gun/On 16 May 1944, during the Italian Campaign, Fusilier Frank Jefferson used a PIAT to destroy a Panzer IV tank and repel a German counterattack launched against his unit as they assaulted a section of the Gustav Line.[35]
On the night of 21/22 October 1944, Private Ernest Alvia ("Smokey") Smith used a PIAT to destroy a German Mark V Panther tank, one of three Panthers and two self-propelled guns attacking his small group. The self-propelled vehicles were also knocked out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PIATOne member of Airborne Forces – Major Robert Henry Cain was awarded a Victoria Cross, partly for his use of a PIAT defending the perimeter during Operation Market Garden and destroying a heavy German Tiger Tank in the process.
https://paradata.org.uk/content/piat-anti-tank-gunIt was effective against any of the lighter German vehicles and could stop a Panzer IV and Panther tank while also able to disable Tiger I.
http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=48Please tell me more about your historical knowledge. The penetrating/critical/top hit is still hit... I don't know why do u say some stupid things about "reliable front hit". Also Panzer IV F1 max armor is 50mm, Piat's penetration is 75mm. Is that hard to comprehend?
Tiger1996 wrote:These aren't bugs to report...
You are not the one to decide about this.
. When you have no arguments u just don't want to waste time to reply xDxD. But it's ok dude, I understand you