stuh can shot tanks and destroy them, his shoting doesnt const anything. he is effective against buildings and infantry as ***.
sherman 105 dont shot anything, its only mobile arty with closer range. every use costs.
stuh vs sherman 105
-
Panzerblitz1
- Team Member
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: 24 Nov 2014, 00:12
- Location: Paris, right under the Eiffel tower.
Re: stuh vs sherman 105
well, again, the Sherman is a long range arty unit, so what is the problem? are you comparing the Stuh42 & the Sheman 105? i don't understand...
-
Sepp(esky)
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 09 May 2020, 19:12
Re: stuh vs sherman 105
Ok. And the sherman 105 is like a wespe on crack. Shoot and scoot and never die to counter arty, run away from arnor, it'sa unit that can easily stay on the field all game untiuched. The StuH has to be in the thick of things to be effective and since 76s and 17lbs one or two shot it, you better have good infantry leading the way finding them...
I get the direct correlation to the StuH but the stuh also requires a bunch of cps, and like the stug, without camo ability are pretty easily dealt with by that same armor and at its so good at killing, supposedly...its reload time and propensity to miss/fire bug do very little damage without hitting just right...meh..the 105 sherman wins. It doesnt need an army to protect it, it has standoff distance
I get the direct correlation to the StuH but the stuh also requires a bunch of cps, and like the stug, without camo ability are pretty easily dealt with by that same armor and at its so good at killing, supposedly...its reload time and propensity to miss/fire bug do very little damage without hitting just right...meh..the 105 sherman wins. It doesnt need an army to protect it, it has standoff distance