Tiger1996 wrote:Surely it would be a massive fault or I mean.. a vey big mistake to invest such a too high amount of res just for the most unreliable tank of the whole game currently: which is sadly the KT!
*facepalm*... as said, the KT is doing much better alone than any other "super tank" like Elephant, SP or JT. Those are crap alone. The KT needs support but less than any of these three others.
Tiger1996 wrote:I have never ever seen a Vet2 KT evenSuch a lame super expensive tank in Bk!!!
SP as I said several times is by far much cheaper and earlier available as well
lol... poor Tiger. However, ive seen often vet KT´s in much more extrem games and situations. When it is just halfway correctly used (with half brain and some support) and when enemie does not have arty superiority, then it very often happend that this tank got high vet by smashing armies with just little support. Arty and SP are the two things the KT really needs to fear at all. Air raids can be dodged and shot down and when this happens the KT can move more or less freely. I mean the last KT i faced did kill two fireflies, one HE sherman, 2 easy eights and one M10 achilles alone by having still 50% HP remaining and also damaged a high vet Jackson which could finally kill the KT. And that tank had no support at all.
Also all skilled axis players are usually playing with a mix of inf (grens, storms, luft inf) and some vehicles (20 mm kwk vehicles etc) going in mid game for Tank IV´s and finally Panther and esspecially Panther G. But in some occassions when those gonna use them they get high vets still. When allied are able to get arty superiority with RA doc then nobody who is sane builds a unit like KT etc.
But same goes for SP. When enemies have henschels and hummels and total arty power then its also stupid to go for a SP usually.
Tiger1996 wrote:Actually these are Axis only players,...
that explains a lot. 99% of these "axis only players" have never learned the game really. They do stuff that is against all tactical knowlegde but up to the last patch they had success with it (and sometimes still).
Ive seen guys with "axis only stats" of like 2000 pvp games as axis played and most won. Usually on typicall axis 2 vs 2 maps (HR). But when they joined a game on another map and other conditions they failed soo bad.
So "axis only" players explains a lot already. From my experience i can say, that mostly those who played all factions quite successfully are the really good players in BK. They dont even need to have "imba stats" as that often indicates that they have a special map and mate to play with and doing all day long just one specific tactic and unit combo. For example when i started with BK i only played PE HR on autry and vire River having quickly a 30 win streak as PE although being a bloody noob actually at that time.
So players with good and average stats (but at least positiv one) with all factions and who play on many maps with many different players and doctrines are usually the best one. They are able to get a quick overview over the map to see which area is important and which doc would be the best at that specific map.
Only those have made real experiences in BK and only those are able to adjust their build orders, unit choice and doctrine choice correctly according to every situation at any time.
Well someppl want let out their "pro" wanna SAY ME what to do what i know, i only waited for sp and it was the only unit i micro, Incase i know mg etc for Support scotts and stuff but yea, i am bored out of allies anyways i did not care for lose or win i just played allie cuz tiger wanted so
Your behaviour is exemplary. You say you are not good with allied and that you dont like them and that you dont care to win or to lose with them and that the SP is the only unit you can micro. I wish more players would speak so freely.
