Tiger1996 wrote:Oh my god.
@Warhawks, u come to tell me how good the Blitz doc is?! o.O Dude, I am an expert Blitz doc player and so I well know that it's much more to be only about Tigers x.x But this is the point.. that's what I don't like!!! Early Pz IVH spam is no fun.
I know that Blitz doc is one of the best docs in the game u don't have to tell me that!
U already said all that to me on Steam, well.. why did u mention nothing about the reloading time of Panthers???!!! It takes too long when compared with many other tanks x.x I would surely prefer Tigers as they reload faster and still have better abilities.
A super tank should never be dead with one shot, do u think I am happy to know that u killed a Pershing Ace that way?! x.x
Stugs are good vs inf???!!! Stug die with 2 poor M9 Bazooka rockets LOL while this is no way realistic. Stugs should better stand vs M9 Bazooka rockets and bounce some btw. While in Bk mod it never does. Idk why!
U don't also yet get my point, I need more quality German tanks vs more quantity Allies tanks!! I guess u already wrote topics about that several times. I know that some of Allies tanks historically should cost nothing at all and not only just lower cost!! I agree that, let's make it! Really, I no joke... Short barrel 75mm Sherman should cost 10 fuel But also Panther should cost 95 fuel. The Panther G noway deserves 160 fuel!!! I am a lot tired to discuss or type more, sorry...
Bazooka will fail. Of two bazookas one gonna fail and one kills not even a Puma... I dont have much problems to beat most of the stuff with by stug III at the time i get that Stug.
You say you are pro with BK doc and you dont use tank IV´s etc just because its no fun? So you want to make Tigers and Panthers better/cheaper just to have more fun? oO. I am confused to be honest.
tanks like 10 fuel? We already have the prob that many tanks are too cheap, esspecially when compared to vehicles. Also Tanks should have better coaxial and not rushable by silly inf blobb and that would make all a way more expensive. I mean wtf... a stug cost less than several inf squads, same as shermans. Afterall they are tanks and should be able to stand against inf. Shermans for 10 fuel..... why dont remove vehicles at all? oO.
Also do you know what a shitload of work it would be? adjusting some tank cost would have huge impact on inf and vehicles and just everything. ALL units would need to be adjusted.... Also 10 shermans or 14 for each player would first hurt the performence as wolf said, the maps would be overcrowded and you would need maps large as MOW maps and bigger.... + micro. In reality each tank had own commander. In Bk you need to controle 10 tanks. So while one need to controle just one tank the other would have to controle 14 and that would also be a balance issue.
I think we have a fair deal and sometimes even unfair deals (e.g 76 sherman compared to Tank IV in cost and performence). But regarding to Panthers its already quite fair as two 76 shermans cost the same so far (even more MP and much more upkeep) but still unable to kill Panther on max range unless booth use HVAP which makes 200 ammo for the guy with shermans which is 1/3 of total possible ammo storage!
Also from historical point of view what do we have? I have some money cost for some tanks.
Sherman M4: 99.000-111.000 Reichsmark (equal to 45.000-50.000 Dollar)
Sherman M4A2 (76): 106.000-113.000 Reichsmark (equal to 48.000-51.000 Dollar)
Panzer IV G: 116.000 Reichsmark
Panther A: 129.000 Reichsmark
So you want the money prices as indicator? Then Panther G would cost as much as 76 sherman but that would require much higher MP income for US in BK. Also you cant compare the economy of those nations. The Axis simply took the ressources and those of occupied nations (esspecially at the end of war) and also used masses of "slaves" in their factories later and all that reduced the money cost significantly. US still payed more or less normal (The War basically end the econemy crisis in the USA and created new jobs). MP in game is not simply comparable to money cost but also work and material intensity. And there axis did need usually more resources for their high quality tanks even when they introduced some simplifications on their 44 Tanks to reduce that. They had a larger offcuts of for each of part on their tanks and a Panther weigt up to 10 tons more than a sherman. Russians had almost no offcuts as they poured more or less their entire Tanks:D So with the ammount of materials of one Tank IV russians got two T-34. I mean the steel prduction of Germany was much better than those of USSR but they still got outnumbered right at the beginning of the War.