Flame Hetzer Camo

[Devilfish]

Hey,
Yesterday I've played a game, where, to my suprise, my opponenet used camo on SE doc flame hetzer and it actually went invisible like TD and considering the huge range of flamethrower i had a problem taking it out with infantry since all the time i have approached it, it roasted my arses out an it remained invisible so inf could not fire bazookas, because there was simply no target to fire at. I had to flank it like idiot guessing the position and later use jumbo (yea that opponent liked flaming a lot).

So my suggestion is just remove camo ability meant for TDs from pure anti inf tank, because it doesn't make any freakin sense at all.

[lunarwolf]

using infantry vs flame hertzer is not the best choice. just use any Sherman and that will do the trick I think it's fine as is. also the range is similar to a croc.

[Devilfish]

Problem isnt that flamethrower is effective vs infantry nor the range of it. Problem and BS is that it can camouflage in a TD style and in addition firing from flamethrower doesnt even give away its position, it remains invisible so you can't even shoot at it.
My point is that flamethrower tank having a camouflage ability is bullshit (why don't m4 flame and croc have camo?).

[Krieger Blitzer]

The Hetzer is a tiny small tank ^^

[Devilfish]

The Hetzer is a tiny small tank ^^

I don't get your meaning. In your opinion it is ok that flamethrower tank can camouflage and remain hidden while spitting fire?

[Warhawks97]

The Hetzer is a tiny small tank ^^

I don't get your meaning. In your opinion it is ok that flamethrower tank can camouflage and remain hidden while spitting fire?

yeah, it shouldnt be. All units get visible when shooting. I think it should be quickly obvious where the flames do come from.