a question to pvp

Do you have a balancing problem or do you want to make a suggestion for the game? You are at the right place.
User avatar
Jalis
Posts: 325
Joined: 25 Nov 2014, 04:55
Location: Canada

a question to pvp

Postby Jalis » 24 Dec 2017, 09:57

If realism is not important in pvp and balance is the must, why pvp dont ask for civil war option ?

On mirrored maps it would offer possibility for a perfect balance, mirroring faction too, and only player skill would make the difference.

It would also solve the problem of game who dont fill because everybody want to play the same side/faction.

Bad side is it would ask a big work to update bk TT, that have major flaws in such situation.

I ask because I played in such situation on others games.

User avatar
Tiger1996
Posts: 3331
Joined: 06 Dec 2014, 15:53
Location: I'm from Egypt, but I live in Qatar.
Contact:

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Tiger1996 » 24 Dec 2017, 16:15

What do you mean with civil war option? You mean Axis vs Axis and Allied vs Allied or what?

If that's all about it, then I don't think it will be fun.. because the "fun" is generated when the tools are different, yet when balanced as well.

And realism should not be completely neglected in PvP but just it's not a top priority.

User avatar
Jalis
Posts: 325
Joined: 25 Nov 2014, 04:55
Location: Canada

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Jalis » 24 Dec 2017, 20:16

yes, axis vs axis for exemple, but also royal commando-terror vs PE luft-US armor ect... Some new horizon to explore.

Allows all factions both side. It is the only way to achieve perfect balance. Only player skill can make the difference. (mirror game extreme exemple)

Perhaps I have a more pvp soul than you think :lol:

Like I suggest it is an option. No way somebody can bound an other player to accept a game configuration he dont want to play.

User avatar
Wolf
Administrator
Posts: 939
Joined: 23 Nov 2014, 16:01
Location: Czech Republic

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Wolf » 24 Dec 2017, 22:18

For me such games just feel weird, I really dislike if game has that option and I play against someone who plays the same, even if its some pseudo-realistic situation.
Image

kwok
Posts: 1115
Joined: 29 Mar 2015, 05:22

Re: a question to pvp

Postby kwok » 24 Dec 2017, 22:58

I think it has been asked before.

User avatar
Redgaarden
Posts: 267
Joined: 16 Jan 2015, 03:58

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Redgaarden » 25 Dec 2017, 17:34

Well, I would love such option. Currently there is no way to match skills of players effiecntly. And it just needs to be added as an option. Not forced upon all players.
Now that I think about it. Can it even be done like that? oh well I see your concern.
Rifles are not for fighting. They are for building!

Diablo
Posts: 8
Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 22:40

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Diablo » 25 Dec 2017, 19:27

There is a mod that does this, it's called Same Fronts. Somebody even adjusted it for our beloved Blitzkrieg conversion in v4.9.5.
Click me

No idea if it works in multiplayer, though.

But as you might see from the comments, the mod author doesn't have permission from the BK team.
So I'm not even sure if I'm on thin ice posting here :?

User avatar
Jalis
Posts: 325
Joined: 25 Nov 2014, 04:55
Location: Canada

Re: a question to pvp

Postby Jalis » 25 Dec 2017, 20:12

Imo it is something that have interest only for pvp. An old pvp game use this feature ; chess.

Technically is not complicated, but would be more time consuming because Actual BK TT would need update.

I can see only one major problem. Player have habits. In such configuration game would require lot of vigilence. I presume if I play today a pvp game as axis and see a panther around I will though it is a team mate. Here ; not necessary.


Return to “Balancing & Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests