Quoting from video:
"Bullshit RE, Blitz can't do shit, 1 emp it's gg vs blitz doc"
"I need to kill the emp, not to avoid, there is noway to kill it as blitz doc, Noway"
That seemed to me a little contradictory with what you said in the video honestly, and I was not trying to be smart, since the full sentence does not change anything in this contradiction i wanted to show you.
Tiger1996 wrote:I admit that the statement is not untrue. Blitz doc indeed has other ways... Never claimed otherwise. Even though that these other ways are not really effective enough in my humble opinion, but let's move on. As I am also not here to compare units\factions or whatever, and probably that's why I don't like to continue the discussions with Hawks about other factions for now.
You keep saying that we lost that video, but my objective was to show you you can destroy emplacements with easy tools, that you can get a mortar before CW player can unlock the 17 pdr emplacement.
I even say that I played bad in that game, YOU keep saying that i have so few games as WH, while Lehr and Wurf are pretty decent Allies players and they have many games with them (when you need to tell they're not Biased towards axis), and still you're surprised to lose a game that was unbalanced since the beginning.
We did not lose that game because of emplacements, at least not on my side, and you know why? Because I tried to destroy the emplacement that was blocking me and i actually managed to do it. Churchills are what pushed me back because, at that time, i did not prepare a counter (my bad). You instead started crying that you could do nothing without even trying. Any of the tools you NOW admit are available in BK doc.
You keep saying we lost because of emplacements (i don't think it was only those, but those combined to unbalanced teams, my inexperience, your laziness and some abuses), but you really can't see that replay as "even someone relatively new to the doc can take down the emplacement", and i bet 2 mortars are enough even to "keep up with destroying emplacements". Do you really think this is so untrue?
You keep saying that you can't use morars since 95mm churchills oneshot them all the time: In this game your first mortar appears at min 5.08.
First emplacement you have to face (which is outside enemy base) is at min 15.30, while you don't even have tanks it could harm anyhow. It was protected by a mortar halftrack that you later managed to take down with your tank.
17pdr emplacement almost kille 2 volks squads trying to rush it under bofors fire, while they were grouped up in the same exact place trying to do i don't know what.
Min 23, you tried for the first time to take down an emplacement with a mortar (which is the earliest, cheapest and easiest solution that has been presented you, and what?!?!? you decrew and almost destroy it??!?!
Maybe if you didn't lose your volks squads to rush an emplacement defended by a bofors and, instead, you kept them for capturing the emplacement you just decrewed, it would have been better. Maybe this emplacement could have killed the nearby churchill. Wasn't this a mistake that could have turned the game?
You later park a stug in front of 2 ab squads equipped with AT and you lose it: isn't this another mistake that could have changed the game maybe?
You know... in this game i see a lot of mistakes, from me, as i say even at the end of the game, but even for you. The difference is I admit them, while you come to forum saying how "in your humble opinion" bk doc should be changed since it can't deal with emplacements. The same emplacements that killed probably 8 volks in the whole game, but were, in your opinion, the cause of our loss and of RE being so OP against Blitz.
Back to our topic, you didn't even try to use a nade bundle against emplacements actually. But you used mortar in a very effective way, while "in your humble opinion is not really effective enough", and the effect it had is clearly shown in the video.
Again you keep saying that we actually lost this game because of emplacement spam, while i think 8 VOLKS lost to 1 emplacement is not really enough to say that emplacement spam caused our loss. You didn't even lose a single tank to 17 pdr emplacements but those were for you the cause of that loss. Can't you see how illogical it is??? At least try, i beg you, TRY to move a little from your "humbleness pedistal" and try to see things a little more objectively and admit your mistakes when you do them.