icon or refer to something someone else said but literally say NOTHING about it as if you were hinting at something... drama happens. It's a pattern I noticed, so sorry for falsely accusing this time.You can be right that a map can be balanced, but I don't think 1v1 maps should be called a BK map. A BK mod tip map implies that the devs recommend playing on this map. If devs are recommending playing on a 1v1 map, then they indirectly recommend playing 1v1s. This contradicts what they say.
While a lot of players DO play a lot of 1v1 games, that doesn't validate them for using it as a means of complaining about balance. Just because something is DONE a lot doesn't make it valid. Internet piracy is done frequently, that doesn't make it valid in determining laws and regulation in a society. Terms and agreements are hardly ever read, that doesn't mean if someone breaches contract they don't have to pay up something they signed.
As for "regardless of its size", I think there I have put up a lot of argument already as to why large maps are better. I also think most people agree small maps are more avoided than large maps. What's that map, St. Mer Dumont or something? It's relatively "balanced" in terms of symmetry but the mid to high level players avoid it for it's cheesy, limiting, formula encouraging traits. What I'm trying to get people to realize is most maps they play are STILL too small like st. mer dumont. On my other post, most people seem to agree with me with the only argument being that large maps can really slow down the game with less immediate action. But, my counter argument to that is should avoidance be an optional strategy as written in many war books? Is not this RTS simulating war? That's what makes Bk great, moving away from the arcadey low complexity style and something more thoughtful. Plus, that argument was brought up in the context where the player played a 1v1 in a 4v4 map... which wasn't what I was pitching for. Other than that, I haven't heard any direct counter arguments that what I said is wrong or even not correct (as in it's definitely a strong balance fixer and the right direction).
All I'm saying is, we have a chance of fixing a LOT of frequent balance complaints if we can actually collectively be brave enough to TRY something that has been mentioned to work by a few good players already. But it seems that a good majority are too afraid of losing their formula for winning and would rather just complain and lobby until their formula works.
But not too much big though.. because, Bk mod is not like Wikinger or the Spearhead mod for CoH2. Where the standard combat ranges are even significantly higher than in BK. Therefore I would say BK needs big maps.. but not huge ones... So yes; a 3vs3 game on a 4vs4 map might be great, but 1vs1 match on a 4vs4 map would be surely awful... Unless you are playing Wikinger or Spearhead. 
. And if you can go around it, do you really need arty to destroy those defenses? 
More than anything else. They could even kill the Pz4.D incredibly fast like I already reported to you throughout my unlisted video via PM which is just hilarious 
And why not to publish it here? I am honestly interested. If you can help with something; then why not to participate more with the MapPack.v2 which Endro and Playmobill are still working hard for it! Do u have any other maps you would like to add other than the 2 ones you previously recommended?! I would be glad to know.
