That's just the US trying to provide proper health care!
(will be fixed )
Search found 3461 matches
- 30 Apr 2020, 18:54
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Airborne HQ squad medics
- Replies: 3
- Views: 596
- 30 Apr 2020, 11:38
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Proposal: Camo should not give bonus modifiers to tank destroyers
- Replies: 50
- Views: 6079
Re: Proposal: Camo should not give bonus modifiers to tank destroyers
You're talking only from the perspective of TDs with strong guns where the penetration drop over distance doesn't matter (Jagdpanther, Nashorn, JPIV L70...) because their guns penetrate Allied tanks 90% of the time anyway. Howeve, for allies this would be a lot less beneficial because M10 and M18 wi...
- 29 Apr 2020, 17:11
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Goliath not giving exp
- Replies: 2
- Views: 383
Re: Goliath not giving exp
Hmmm...it is not like we set it that way on purpose, we set nothing for Goliaths that other units don't have so I have no idea why it acts like this. My guess would be that the green XP numbers show both the XP you get towards your CP unlocks and also the XP that units receive towards their Veteranc...
- 29 Apr 2020, 13:08
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: WM Flakpanzer 38(t) is available without T2 upgrade
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1017
Re: WM Flakpanzer 38(t) is available without T2 upgrade
It is not a bug. Some vehicles in T2 building were set to be available without T2 upgrade. The Flakpanzer 38 is basically a worse version of the halftrack with flak 38 in Defense doctrine which is also available without the T2 upgrade. Also this unit can be reliably penetrated even by the 37mm AT gu...
- 27 Apr 2020, 14:17
- Forum: Ask an Expert
- Topic: Cover effect on vehicles
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1291
Re: Cover effect on vehicles
Hi, vehicles in BK receive no modifiers from cover other than speed nerfs. Cover works only for infantry.
- 26 Apr 2020, 10:19
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: 5.1.7 version "stolen" MG42 or M1919 takes no orders
- Replies: 2
- Views: 515
Re: 5.1.7 version "stolen" MG42 or M1919 takes no orders
I haven't been able to reproduce this bug. When I capture enemy MG, it works as it should. Are there any specific steps to reproduce this?
- 24 Apr 2020, 13:28
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Not a QOL Update
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1077
Re: Not a QOL Update
It is not objective anymore They always try to be too objective ...coming from a guy who's been extremely subjective about the beta with the "my way or no way" mindset from the start. Sorry but omg guys idc no more So...everything as usual? :roll: Fire or water, you are equalising all this shit One...
- 14 Apr 2020, 21:53
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: New Super Pershing model for BK!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 13095
Re: New Super Pershing model for BK!
According to what I found on the Internet, it was something called "external recuperator springs" or "hydraulic counter-ballace cylinders". It had something to do with ballancing the gun which was needed because of its extreme length. Don't ask me how that worked, I'm no expert so have no idea. Anyw...
- 12 Apr 2020, 09:51
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Sabotaging points for US Air doctrine?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1216
Re: Sabotaging points for US Air doctrine?
As kwok said - no specific reason why AB doesn't have it. In the last beta update 101st lost some abilities so maybe they could get this one to gain some utility back. it's a rarely used ability in pvp games vCoH was mainly focused on playing the VP mode where one of the VPs was usually near the bas...
- 10 Apr 2020, 12:58
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: British Wasp
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2093
Re: British Wasp
On top of that, Bren carrier with upgraded mg is a pretty good defensive unit against infantry, having a good suppression output and being (not sure if that's just a feeling) more lethal than the normal mg squad and still more mobile. As far as I can remember, the Vickers on Bren carrier has the sa...
- 25 Mar 2020, 20:52
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: 518c bugs & more
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1422
- 21 Mar 2020, 16:23
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: AB doc needs some love
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3722
Re: AB doc needs some love
the 101st isn't anything to write home about, stats wise they are riflemen but more expensive, at least until you get the health upgrades. If "DPS" is all that counts in your book then you are right. However, there are other factors contributing to unit's performance and overall usefulness. Compare...
- 18 Mar 2020, 16:34
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1588
Re: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
You're right, the AI doesn't know how to call in the trucks but it is because it is now done through an ability and not through "building a unit" anymore. Teaching AI to use an ability correctly is a bit tricky but we'll try to solve it.
- 18 Mar 2020, 03:03
- Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
- Topic: 1v1 - US Air vs Blitz
- Replies: 2
- Views: 562
Re: 1v1 - US Air vs Blitz
Is this beta or live version?
- 17 Mar 2020, 23:26
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1588
Re: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
Yes, there is a timer problem with the Armor HQ truck. It actually gets spawned but after about 70 seconds after the "call in timer" reaches zero.
It will be fixed on the next update.
Thanks for the report .
It will be fixed on the next update.
Thanks for the report .
- 17 Mar 2020, 23:23
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: faulty graphic of Koenigstiger in beta
- Replies: 2
- Views: 816
Re: faulty graphic of Koenigstiger in beta
Will be fixed in the next update.
Thanks for the report .
Thanks for the report .
- 17 Mar 2020, 02:49
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Improving the ATs in the BETA
- Replies: 6
- Views: 885
Re: Improving the ATs in the BETA
As for the 76mm (...),but higher damage would probably be fine on its own although im not sure how well that'd be received. It should be mentioned that same weapons are unified to have same penetration and damage stats no matter what they are mounted on so e.g. a 75mm L48 has same damage and pen.va...
- 15 Mar 2020, 00:28
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1588
Re: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
We'll check it. We wanted to use the HQ truck and remove the "go mobile" button but the problem is that the the trucks blow up when destroyed and they leave no wreck behind. This means that if the HQ truck gets destroyed, the only option to "rebuild" it is calling a new HQ from off map (as it is in ...
- 13 Mar 2020, 16:48
- Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
- Topic: Beta 4v4
- Replies: 2
- Views: 692
Re: Beta 4v4
Hi, I'll check the Piat squad. The flame nades are now available only to the 82nd squad, 101st and HQ squads no longer have them. Similarly, the offmap mortar barrage is now only available to the HQ squad and when the squad is at (iirc) vet4 they get offmap 105mm barrage instead. The Sten Tommies ar...
- 13 Mar 2020, 16:40
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1588
Re: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
Hi, no problem :) The replay is a .rec file which can only be used in the game to re-watch the match. The game always saves the last game as "temp.rec" but this file is overwritten with the next match you play (even skirmish against AI) unless you click the "save replay" button and give it some spec...
- 13 Mar 2020, 04:18
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1588
Re: CW - Bugging when calling in armor command truck
Has this happened only with the armor truck or have you also experienced it with the Infantry truck? Do you have a replay saved? It could help clarify what happened.
- 13 Mar 2020, 04:14
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2061
Re: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
Ok. In that list of roles you mentioned, you didn't really mention what you intend the role of the M8 to be without its versatility. From what I have gathered in using it without a 50cal, you are better off just building a specialist in all situations, or saving for a light tank if you really want ...
- 12 Mar 2020, 04:23
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2061
Re: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
I agree that the combination of 37mm gun and 50cal (and how soon it was possoble to get this combination) was the issue. However I don't think it was an issue only because the 50cal increased efficiency against vehicles but also because it provided enough firepower to kill infantry squads trying to ...
- 11 Mar 2020, 20:29
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2061
Re: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
@Hawks: Greyhound in previous update had a 50cal, which was a bit weaker than the 20mm cannon, and also the 37mm gun. The combination made it a lot better than the puma at killing vehicles and still pretty good at killing infantry. Puma has just the 20mm so it is overall not such a pain in the ass t...
- 11 Mar 2020, 14:32
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2061
Re: M8 greyhound HE vs canister shot
The reaaon for delaying the 50cal on Greyhound was the fact that it provided a unit that had a good AT capacity against light vehicles (which was boosted evem further with the 50cal) but also good anti-infantry capacity. So the mg was delayed to make sure people will use other things not just this o...