Was the 75mm cannon on the chaffe buffed in terms of pen? Or just 75mm shermans?
Search found 745 matches
- 13 Nov 2020, 23:23
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Specifics that need to be fixed
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3323
Re: Specifics that need to be fixed
- 13 Nov 2020, 20:15
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Specifics that need to be fixed
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3323
Re: Specifics that need to be fixed
I've also had the problem were we had x 5 AA's and didn't do anything. (high valley map)
2 ostwinds + 3 gepards.
2 ostwinds + 3 gepards.
- 12 Nov 2020, 05:05
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Specifics that need to be fixed
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3323
Re: Specifics that need to be fixed
The only thing i don't like is about Fallsh are their starting weapons, X6 MP40 is kind of excesive just give them more flexibility by adding more weapon upgrades and make them start with full kars with the option to upgrade them with mp40 , scoped ghewers or Fg. Also i haven't still found a viable ...
- 09 Nov 2020, 23:43
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - RAF - Some artillery for Commandos
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1461
Re: CW - RAF - Some artillery for Commandos
+ 1 to the pack howitzer.
- 09 Nov 2020, 23:39
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Base Bombers black list
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1284
Re: Base Bombers black list
Dude, whats wrong with basebombing, if he wants to do it he can do it, just do the same when playing againts him again and done lol.
- 02 Nov 2020, 22:57
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3902
Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
How many of you guys here did play the current beta, and if played, how many games? I cant since i am currently in Berlin and not at home. But in the old Beta the Hetzers and IV/48´s were rare (in the past most Hetzers got used by Luftwaffe and TH doc, now one doc is completely reworked with TD spa...
- 02 Nov 2020, 22:23
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3902
Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
How many of you guys here did play the current beta, and if played, how many games?
- 02 Nov 2020, 22:20
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4756
Re: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
I've played a few games on the beta, everything seems pretty good i like the new changes to 76mm/75mm and AB, it finally feels like you have a little more chances to go 50% 50% againts pz4 H/J and TD's (if they're not in cammo). Can you find a way to make Chaffe a little more viable? Maybe get rid o...
- 30 Oct 2020, 19:21
- Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
- Topic: BETA TEST - 2v2
- Replies: 1
- Views: 352
BETA TEST - 2v2
Kwok(Airbone), Dick (Airbone) vs Fig (PanzerSupport), Sparkles (Blitzkrieg).
attachments in case one dosn't work, but should be the same replay.
attachments in case one dosn't work, but should be the same replay.
- 29 Oct 2020, 21:54
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4756
- 29 Oct 2020, 19:28
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4756
Re: Beta Release 5.2.2
Hope i have briefly come down as much explanatory as possible I don't know man...comparing 76mm to 90mm or 17 pounder doesn't seem right here. The benefit of these two guns is their effectiveness against Panthers, Tigers and other late game stuff. The 76mm is nowhere near their performance against ...
- 29 Oct 2020, 18:47
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Costs of Axis Tank Hunters
- Replies: 4
- Views: 838
Costs of Axis Tank Hunters
I like the changes, i don't know about the new pen boost against L/70 needs further testing, but since TD are supposed to fight on cammo those would just oneshots any sherman variant anyway. I would suggest to have in mind some price reductions for: https://i68.servimg.com/u/f68/18/95/50/92/panzer10...
- 28 Oct 2020, 22:38
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
- 26 Oct 2020, 22:49
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4700
Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
no. we tried your suggestion for other things and now we're trying to balance against exactly that. - change WM tiering so that vehicles come earlier - change k98s to be lazer rifles and people wonder why all of axis just seems stronger than all of allies. because the base changed. besides there's ...
- 24 Oct 2020, 22:06
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4700
Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
SIgh.... just... try my suggestion about changing allied teching cost/system before even trying something else.
- 19 Oct 2020, 21:23
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
Re: [US] Structural changes
What's the reason for these changes? I might personally know but would like it said "outloud" please. The idea is to: Force the axis players to avoid skipping early phases as fast as possible by forcing them to fight longer againts US early vehicles. This would also give some new strategy opens onc...
- 19 Oct 2020, 20:11
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
Re: [US] Structural changes
This is pretty accelerated. The sct car will become buildable at 45 fu or even 30. Meanwhile for WM the first vehicle even being available (not even buildable because of fuel costs) comes at 55 fuel. This feels like people will fall into the "rush 50cal sct car/quad ht" formula. Vehicles available ...
- 19 Oct 2020, 20:00
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
Re: [US] Structural changes
This tank could become a light mobile 350 MP tank that can use ambush and mobility. Would in particular be usefull in inf focused docs that need some support with german early medium tanks and light vehicles. A cheap general purpose light tank to support other units when neither sherman nor M10 is ...
- 19 Oct 2020, 17:11
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
Re: [US] Structural changes
like it. But why does WSC requires motorpool? Just asking. And could the chaffe be in the Tank depot or available after it? It would cost not more than a stuart in return and these two tanks wouldnt be reward units anymore. - Why does WSC requires motorpool? I needed to add some time into teching w...
- 19 Oct 2020, 02:27
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: [US] Structural changes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1488
[US] Structural changes
This is my suggestion about structural changes for default US, Units available, new prices, etc. US forces https://i.imgur.com/9sIjMYt.jpg Headquarters Starts with 55 Fuel on HRes Units available: https://media.moddb.com/images/articles/1/36/35818/auto/allies_engineers.gif https://i.imgur.com/cg4jMa...
- 19 Oct 2020, 00:09
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Armor Doctrine suggestion.
- Replies: 47
- Views: 5356
Re: Armor Doctrine suggestion.
1- Pershing can mantain is CP cost, thats not the problem the US was never designed to have an easy to get heavy tank compared to panther. 2-You say that 2 shermans 75mm are better than a jumbo 75mm in a momment were axis dominate the medium tank phase with stugs and pzF, what would u do with both s...
- 18 Oct 2020, 20:59
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1308
Re: AB Airstrike CP Path
One of the complaints some players have are how doctrines are starting to all look the same. The proposal here seems to be make 82nd more like rangers but with parachutes. Would you make a post around revising tech'ing time if that's how you feel? ---------------------------------------------------...
- 18 Oct 2020, 19:34
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1308
Re: AB Airstrike CP Path
Im sorry, but this is a stupid suggestion, current airstrikes are fine as they are. Most of the current problems with AB doc were inf based could be resolved by just reworking the bases of US units, without making huge reworks on the special available units of each doctrine, i would only go as far a...
- 11 Oct 2020, 21:15
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Problems with PVP in the lobby
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2044
Re: Problems with PVP in the lobby
I still don't see some pvp games.
- 10 Oct 2020, 17:05
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: [5.2.0.] WM illegal units in infantry only
- Replies: 1
- Views: 405
Re: [5.2.0.] WM illegal units in infantry only
They're commitining crimes of war, wich means is historically realistic.