Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Hi MarkKr, when patch will be ready? I'm really want to like to see the changes for bright future of BK special souce.

I hope we get this patch soon, instead of talks, so we can proof those words

Andrusha - RAF Not - Blitz 22 min game, with a very harsh start for Wehr. Basically repeating the same working formula with spamming medium tanks, but now with included "call-in" battle group ability from Blitzkrieg, that allows you to basically double your forces with paying no ammunition...

Good game, it was really close for Shanks, if not the mistake with the Panther, otherwise it would be opposite.
I call for rematch! One game is not an arguement.

Panzer-Lehr-Division wrote:

Shanks wrote:

Panzer-Lehr-Division wrote:yeah sure lets do it

good idea, let's have fun (on Sunday, connect)

And i just won as US in 1v1 against you

Mister, I need evidences, or I can think that you lost against uber-power Shanks.

Andrusha - Luft
Not - Blitz
-
Lehr - RAF
Mayor Ysef - RE

Was pretty hard game, untill someone managed to use community tricks to overhelm nasty brits defences.
Enjoy.

Also you are funny. Yes, brits can counter heavies. But they trouble if you keep spamming cheap and medium costing units at them. I never get for anything bigger than panther bc of arty, 17 pdrs etc. If two stugs overrun a 17 pdr you have made a good deal already. If you play Terror and WH vs brits...

When these units become better in killing tanks rather than defenses it just ends up that non of them will be used against any defenses anymore. The AVRE will stay behind AA tanks and firefly or whatever and kills all the tanks the firefly cant. And the ST doesnt shoot emplacments bc its a waste ac...

Henny wrote:I thought this was going to be a pornographic orgy from the title, kind of shocked to see how all of axis basically has the same score

lmao

Back to this topic, I would like to add; About the Churchill AVRE, I would like to see this unit improved in some way.. it currently sucks to be honest. I was thinking of an idea, what if it would be more like a "mini-SturmTiger" instead of just nothing but a useless "heavy mortar&qu...

The New BK Champion wrote:I am interested.

The dark horse - mysterious proffesional BK player enters the arena.

I still dont get why u cant understand the salt here. V1 was never used. Many reasons. Now its changed for even pricier form of itself. Somehow became used. (i like the way here, on forum, life goes. } People start on topic - almost right on dev's say what's what - answer is being left behind - peo...

The title. Devs didn't say to us happy new year or shit. Now BK forum is empty. Happy new year

You can take the example from "arcadish" COH2 vanila, where almost every basic infantry unit can use AT tools, to break tank's engine and damage it, making using alone vehicles without a proper support useless.

I am afraid you are wrong, my friend. WH 37mm half-track does not have 75 range, but 10 less range.. which means it's not the same as the 57mm US half-track! Also, when HE rounds are loaded, the range goes down! However, let's imagine that what you say is somehow correct... It would be still absolu...

EVERYBODY ABUSES THAT 34% PENETRATION?????????? you told tiger same chances to everyone will be more fair and so he told you if the reload should be same, the penetration vs bigger tanks should be same too, but now after he tell you this, you dont think everyone should have the same chances anymore...

I think the argument of "SturmTiger has element of surprise due to not making a very loud noise when it shoots" is still not a very strong argument. There are such destructive arty tools that also make not much noise.. example, Long Tom! Not to mention the Airborne bombing run airstrike w...

This halftrack is currently has the range of 57mm AT halftrack, that USA has.
Range is same when is HE rounds loaded. Tiger1996 do you approve unit that better than USA-peasent one????

So, here we come back to the first point once again... 76 reload is 6 to 7 seconds, Pz4 reload is 4.5 to 5.5 seconds... You consider 1.5 seconds as BIG DEAL, but 34% penetration chance against Tiger1 by 76 compared to 26% penetration chance against Pershing by Pz4 as NOT a big deal on the other han...

Everybody would have same chances, when same investments are done in those tanks. This is possible, but I think this would only be more boring.. because if you give everyone the "same chances" then this game would be even more all about pure luck. For example reducing the reload time of t...

I mean, buffing 76 Shermans is actually "fine" but at the same time, I think it can also be "risky" to the overall PvP balance. I don't mind if a airborne or infantry player instead of hellcat or whatever pussy shit, would go something else, just to juice the combat. And, at thi...

And btw, M10 can kill Tigers from the front.. if you didn't know! That's even "more expensive" than the Jumbo and the M10 is even cheaper than the Pz4, so what? Please don't compare tank destroyer with a panzer 4, you know it is wrong. Removing 76 is not a deal, you just proof your words ...

doctrine actually does not even need them most of the time So earlier they were a great weapon by your words, now you think its good to delete them entirely and it won't do affect anything! That a not really good reason to just throw out of a window a unit that has no use. Oh by the way, any panzer...

To be fair, the ST actually has some positives compared to former V1 - V1 strike cost 200 ammo (ST shot is 150), and V1 had longer cooldown than the shot on ST. However I still think the negatives outweight the positives and so the original point still stands - ST is nerf for Terror doctrine compar...

Hawks.. my dear friend, if this can be considered as not a significant penetration difference... Here the exact values: 76 gun vs Tiger penetration at max range: 22,14% Damage max: 600 (average 500) (Tiger HP: 1100) With special AP rounds: 34,1% Damage max: 600 (average 500) Axis 75 mm L/48 vs Pers...