Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

yes please.

this one is very good game. i like how you played on all three fronts supporting your mates. one day and this video is already blowing up. game was very fun to watch and there was so much combat and dynamic war............more like this.

aimed salvo for priest is rediculiously strong

and royal artillery spotter off map is very op
whermacht officer off map is much weaker

Consti255 wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2022, 13:42

I agree here.
I doint think Panthers will suffer too much from that.

yes
+1

we talked about pershing ace with accurate long shot it will be only one allied tank available late but anyone thought about the firefly....? in the entire allied arsenal.......firefly i think was made especially for this purpose. long range operations. maybe we should give the firefly accurate long...

Krieger Blitzer wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2022, 16:11

Mainly, the core reason is to make the 75mm Sherman more valuable

royal engineers dont even need tulips......95 churchill does the job.

i think tulips should be removed from royal engineers and given to royal air force.

Krieger Blitzer wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 15:38

Maybe at some point we will have an Axis jet model that fires rockets similar to RAF & AB as reward for Henschels.

has to be the ME 262

camouflage ability button was removed from rangers too, maybe they have the same problem?

yes please

this ability will make pershing ace after 12 command points finally useful again

and yes i am still alive

for me the prices dont make any sense ........later panther models more cheap than earlier models :?: ............. and you nerf hard jagdpanther in speed and health only to make it 2cp earlier :?: ......... and i dont understand your new tech tree.......so how many command points tiger1 will need :?:

cw is the most op faction in the game.........

Consti255 wrote: ↑

25 May 2021, 20:02

Are you telling me that a Panther that cost 95 fuel isnt "far" cheaper than a Tiger costing 170fuel?
No offense but are you jokeing?

what about the same tank in luftwaffe for 880 and 130 ?

why do we need * more jumbos *
do you see any jumbo in your games at all


we do not need * more jumbos * ....... because now there isn't any......

The Panther is a far better tank at tank on tank engagements due to it's armor and accuracy, it is also a far cheaper tank currently, so losing on to tank engagements doesn't exactly hurt too much either. Again this also solidifies the importance of the Tiger 1 as a breakthrough tank rather than Pa...

H.Drescher wrote: ↑

24 May 2021, 18:23

There is no need for that. Infantry has plenty of options to deal with tanks.

i think 76 jumbo needs more space to be used...........this is not about infantry doctrine...........but about the unit itself.

Krieger Blitzer wrote: ↑

24 May 2021, 01:23

Thus, i would like to know what exactly are the suggestions we are talking about here?

it is good to ask this question because no one ever agreed what the suggestions are.............everyone suggested something different..........#fact

My prediction: Axis players will go completely nuts about their expensive Panthers and other tanks getting one-shot by 90mm and 17 pounder guns, and will request either to bring down the buffs (which I will refuse to do because these values are needed, as explained in previous posts) or to buff the...

and not just against Panthers but also Tigers, JP, KT, Elefants and all that stuff because those guns are the intended and only available direct counters. no one complained about tigers, jp and king tigers or elefant :!: and by how much you want to buff versus these :?: it was told to buff 90mm but...

Aaaand here we go again..."don't touch my Panther, rather just buff other stuff". I think I've already mentioned the never ending "buff spiral". But I'm done arguing about this over and over, so fine...Panthers will go back to what they were and Jacksons will get a buff: - 70 basic range - guarante...

Sukin-kot (SVT) wrote: ↑

22 May 2021, 21:15

We have a working proof of this concept in the previous Bk versions.

i think it was too bad experience................all tank destroyers from ambush were too powerful no matter which tier.

No buff for 76mm it performs good vs axis medium tanks. And no nerf for panthers front armor either. I am agree with ring back panthers acceleration and speed, that is one of the big difference with Tiger 1 and we should keep it. +1 Besides, I wouldn't mind improving the ambush bonuses across both ...

this panther needs buff.........its toooooo bad. or is cromwell toooo op? racing car.....

i had a game just now and killed 4 panther d with 1 cromwell.
replay is from workshop map so it wont work........my opponent rage quit after fourth panther kill.

What needs to happen generally: - 76 jumbo moved to Armor doc with limit of 2 and 100 fuel price, so inf doc will only have B1 jackson. - Churchill MK5 is also misplaced in RA doc, so it should be replaced with Achilles. - AB bombing airstrike buffed vs tanks, and Stuka dive bomber buffed vs tanks ...

yes.....i am very biases to allies.....i want to hardcore buff them.

it's what i hope the most.....now add jackson to ab doctrine please.