Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

So... the E8 is finally worth for something? lmao

I really like this, but it will never be implemented since it dosn't go for any of the mod owners.

I totally love mencius idea, please have it in mind. I would also like to see more different kind of officer groups for other doctrines.

One of the most common problems i had was when clickin on an enemy tank with my tank, instead of getting on the range stopping and shoot, it just seems to keep going forward forward and forward until its kissing the enemy tank.

I actually just stopped playing cause live version is boring and exploitable while the new updates aren't taking an approach that interest me. As for community just pick someone to teammate with and ignore the rival players i was used to play with new guys and it didn't even bother me, if you're gon...

kwok wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020, 09:18

Bump for the cry babies in the community

lol

What about the option to deploy weapons on the ground like the EAW one does? and also a set up hability that deploys 2 engies to repair close vehicles.

That would open new strategies to equip squads with weapons they're not able to get normally.

Ok. In that list of roles you mentioned, you didn't really mention what you intend the role of the M8 to be without its versatility. From what I have gathered in using it without a 50cal, you are better off just building a specialist in all situations, or saving for a light tank if you really want ...

So what you're saying here is that because you have high win rate with Luft the new TS doc needs to be stronger than Luft just so you play something else? No, im saying that every doc will we played biased on player preference since everything has been changed to handle any doctrine vs scenario. So...

Yes, they are limited to 2, no they don't get the passive bonuses, both of which is intended. I already said it - infantry is meant to be the weaker side of this doc. If we make a doctrine with this selection of tanks, tank destroyers, vehicles and also give it an above-average infantry, it will ju...

Hawks, the doctrine has assault pios and Pgrens. Pgrens can be further boosted with the passive unlocks beyond the standard Pgren performance which is already pretty good. Pgrens are there to advance with vehicles and tanks. The Pgrens provide (in this case better) support + can quickly repair dama...

@Markr. The issue still remains that you have to fight largely with rifles only. I think thats quite a nasty thing, esspecially for docs like this one that depends on pushes and assaults. BK doc has it storms, RE and US armor special engis with close range weapons. But this doc has to rely more or ...

- I tested the hotchkiss and it doesn’t seem like it received any proper nerfs now that TH has proper multi-role tanks that can act in anti-infantry roles if needed. If the hotchkiss can’t be removed from the doctrine then I would personally nerf it because it’s too viable with a Jagdtiger/Kingtige...

Could probably make a seperate post about it, but I'm curious as to how people would feel about making AA units stronger across the board but making airstrikes significantly cheaper with maybe a slightly shorter cooldown. Might give air doc players more to do and give more incentive to build AA (al...

you can counter snipers with either a M5 Stuart "Recce ,M8 Armored Car, Motorcycle, vampire, jeep. Are they expensive?. The solution could be give then less HP that's it. -M5 dosn't have a good radio detection -M8 dosn't have a good radio detection -Vampire is a cheated unit that should dissapear o...

The durability difference between pershing and jackson is much more considerable than you described, figree. You might feel the jackson is more worth it because your micro is above average where you can more skillfully use the jackson but the average player will consider the pershing as a more reli...

Honestly the pershing armor could be hardened since it comes really late and there is almost no difference between going for jackson or pershing. Jacksons can somethimes survive 2 shoots of PaK's 42 L/70 75mm's can still deal same amount of damage than pershing, they're also faster and cheaper. So, ...

Put panzreaks on a trench with cammo bonus, goodbye AVRE before even getting close enough to shoot LOL.

AB "changes" was a déception regarding infantry unlocks and support weapon unlocks. I can say nothing but to agree with all of what hawks said in his last post.

If stupa work as the current AVRE does, then i will never ever make it (unless you crazily overbuff their stats), i will be fine dealing with emplacements with just scotts and stuh's. I don't usually make scotts and stuh's in current beta version to deal with infantry, just to deal with AA's emplace...

I would like to see the churchill AVRE working as the stupa, wasn't the stupa "realistically" made for the same end that the AVRE warhawks? but still preffer how the stupa works in-game.

The 50mm was too close to getting stugs wich was meta and with stugs IV having cammo from start now i think they're not gonna be used that much anymore unless you add cammo to "p50" or something special like arillery call ins, if you still think 50mm has a bad chance againts greyhounds go record a v...

kwok wrote:you quoted me but i feel like you didnt read anything i said since you didnt seem to respond to anything i said at all.

My bad didn't wanted to quote you but yeah i did read what you wrote.

I am bumping this thread again because I am kind of worried when kwok said that TH would be the last major rework before they move to balancing. I would really like to see the early churchills be cheap health sponge tanks with the same amount of armor as a sherman (so basically a slower sherman wit...

My only suggestion would just be, move the rocket hotchkiss unlock to SE. Are we making a well rounded doctrine right? what do you propuse to figth camping game with this doctrine? example: Armor have the jeep caliope and keep the sherman kaliope and now we have the sherman 105mm too (I like those ...