Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Hi everyone, Here is the first draft of the survey results I promised. I tried to take all the results and put them together. This is only a draft, I wanted to work on it more but I've gotten so busy in life that I thought I should just show you all now even if it's unfinished. This is just a balanc...

Yeah, allies have an equivalent in the RAF doctrine. Drop the tetrarch glider and you can build 76mm field guns. They dont have indirect fire though.

it fires itself like an AT gun but for infantry. ive gotten that fucker to ambush squad wipe many bastards.

That flakpanzer has to deploy to attack ground. When it’s not deployed it’s on AA mode.

Also the howitzer bug should be fixed next patch?

Could make the recon plane near invincible and never crash.

So one thing I was thinking is to make the ability like if a plane gets shot down it can never be used again. In SD44 you control the plane itself like it’s a unit. If it gets shot down you no longer have it And just cuz I know it might be asked, I don’t know how to make it that you’d have multiple ...

Grr that was my secret for a while. I was going to bring this up as point to general sniper reworks.

Even if possible I’d rather say keep the option to recrew than to not. There are still situations where you want to sacrifice a squad to recrew. I think it makes a game better if you have to make a hard decision rather than be unable to have any decision at all.

Only my opinion though

I was wondering it's probably possible to stop this exploit by adding a requirement to the bombard abilities that a player must be a particular doctrine to use. What do you think? In general i think unit limits aren't something worth including, units should be balanced so limits aren't an issue. It ...

AFAIK this is an oversight

This is where the line becomes difficult though, there is no criteria on who is a good player. There are no "professional players" because no one is being paid to play this game, otherwise it'd be easy to identify who to listen to. There is only "pro" in the slang term that means...

First of all, no amount of matches will provide objective results. Second of all, it doesn’t even matter what I think about luft because if the majority agree on something then it is more likely that the majority is right. Even if the majority is not right, it is how the game is evolved and the inte...

and who knows how to use luft? ... tell me There is not a single pro player who has played with luft and who has not been defeated by me in BK, from 1v1 to 4v4, even you ... especially if I play with doc inf or RA If you have crusader and rifleman with the British, you stop 70% of the Luft force, i...

Shanks wrote:

The New BK Champion wrote:Luft is strong not beacuse it's good itself, it's because somewhy people don't know how to counter it

it's totally true

My argument to this is: the reason luft is “counterable” is because players don’t know how to play luft

The post before plays pvp. I play pvp.
I have also sent out a mass survey among players who have experience and play. Survey shows luft is really strong.

Markr, what about just increasing the range of the throw and decreasing range of activation?

I know what you mean. I might be able to think of something but not sure if it’ll break the ability.

Hey man, glad to see another USA based player.
There are a few folks we can intro you to.
I’m Kwok on steam (the one with an elephant as a picture) in California in pacific time.
Walderschmidt, Mefisto, Shadowichigo are all on est

Yeah I think there was intent to make it as you mentioned, it's just really hard to balance due to the nature of the weapon. Unlike other weapons in coh where damage is done per bullet/shell/etc with cooldown times, flamethrowers are like mega weapons where their cooldowns are fractions of fractions...

Don’t leave too early tiger. If stupa moves to bk, what would differentiate the stupa and stuh42? They’d serve nearly the same role but stupa is bigger/slower. Should they be reward if each other?

Yes, I’ve been following this and the tiger topic very closely. Especially since a lot of these thoughts were actually included in a doctrine rework proposal way before this topic and the tiger topic was even discussed. The problem is, I haven’t had a chance to write my entire idea (because it’s not...

That fucker outranges the base AA emplacements so use that knowledge to your advantage

Yes, but you said the unit no longer exists. It still exists in PE. The change was done as a buff to axis in the pvp setting. Since then, allied vehicle rushes (especially the recent rush) have become less powerful. Keeping both would be too strong for WM since it would essentially provide more opti...

It isn’t meant to be field artillery, just a field gun providing direct fire support