Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

can axis get a tiger tank for 800 manpower only?

it's funny some people think jumbo is weak when it costs only 780 manpower.
the real cost for this tank would be something like 900 manpower and 100 fuel.

I don't think this is a problem though - think about TDs. When you tell them to go somewhere, they go there. They only start to auto-rotate when they're not moving. Tanks can do the same, except the turret can rotate at any time, even while they're on their way somewhere. thats what i said. with ho...

panthers should never be weaker. otherwise people will just build panzer4.h

sounds like an over.nerf

agree jacksons manpower can be less. We have also the same concern on some axis tanks, its in discussion. yes. panther.g is overpriced. 890 manpower. 155 fuel and 7 command point. it can be 800 manpower and 145 fuel. nothing too special about this tank anymore after losing the scope upgrade. tiger1 ...

yes. i agree with everyone. move panther.d to blitz doctrine as reward for panther.a and get leig18 unlock in luft. remove firefly from raf and get 75mm howitzers unlock same as american airborne. it will be small arty tool for raf too. just like lieg18 for luft. keep hetzer and achilles in luft and...

im not sure if anyone of you have played coh2 but all units in coh2 have hold fire ability. and it works very well in preventing issues like this turret problems. because your tanks will not rotate their turret or decide to engage enemies without your permission so it is much easier to keep their t...

im not sure if anyone of you have played coh2 but all units in coh2 have hold fire ability. and it works very well in preventing issues like this turret problems. because your tanks will not rotate their turret or decide to engage enemies without your permission so it is much easier to keep their tu...

it should be easier when abilities like hold fire are added for all tanks.

This has been around for a long time and it happens to all kinds of static howitzers - US, WM and CW to both emplaced and naked versions. Unless there is someone who can tell me how to reproduce the bug, it is hard to fix it. :/ i know. but i think the 25 pounders are now particularly more broken w...

im surprised there is still no one talking about these bugs. so it is time to tell. the 25 pounders are bugged. most of the time they dont want to fire. unless it is very close range and only when they don't have to rotate. and when the supercharge rounds in royal artillery is unlocked. the yellow c...

so there will be beta 5 ?
i think it will need to be tested again after you remove the crit to make sure it's not suddenly too weak or still too op

150mm cannon. and m10 has weak armor and the crew are exposed. are you saying a tank costs 600 manpower 100 fuel and 50 ammo killing another tank that costs only 320 manpower and 35 fuel....is over powered ????? it will be over powered only if the 320 manpower and 35 fuel unit can kill the other wit...

increasing the scatter will make it worse. this way you will never know where the rocket will land and hit your units. it will be more unexpected and harder to dodge. at least now you know where the rockets will land so you move away. and lowering the damage itself will not make sense too. because i...

hotchkiss does not need more scatter. does not need less damage. hotchkiss needs more ammo cost for the barrage. from 55 to 80 ammo.
and it is easy change to do. without need for another beta.

ok. if we assume 1 rocket costs 20 ammo. then hotchkiss 4 rockets barrage should cost 80 ammo maximum. with current damage of course.

Proposal to fix strategic nuke: -Increase the munition cost to match that of the 210mm Nebel ( 100-110 Munition I forget) -Reduce AOE splash damage -Reduce damage overall -Give allies nukes too too much nerf in my opinion. i agree with mark. hotchkiss is fine on the beta. maybe barrage price can be...

and how does that solve the problem? Only the two guys that operate the gun are hard to kill because they are in the "cover zone" of the AT. If you reduce the number of soldier to 2, then the one extra (standing behind the gun) will not be there and the two operating the gun will still be...

possible solution....reduce the gun crew from 3 to only 2 soldiers.
in addition....you could also make it same as bigger anti tank guns, can not be operated with 1 crew.

and there are many other solutions you can squeeze out if you give it just some thought. without touching the model.

Well not really, the gunner add more options to some tanks who really need it, removing this option by making it more dificult to recrew the gunner would nerf these units a bit too much imho. it is sometimes easier to drive your tank back to base or bring a transporter truck nearby than to bring en...

now when the tank top gunners die, you repair the tank and they come back to life again.....unrealistic. the idea....when the tank gunner dies, free upgrade will appear. it will be possible to upgrade only next to HQ buildings or ammo & transporter trucks. more like "reinforcing" but f...

you seem so obsessed only about british artillery. is it because you like it the most ? and did you test all other artillery in the game and from axis side too or only the british ? the damage was buffed on the center of the explosion. not nerfed. there might be accuracy mistakes now. but i also thi...

what replay ???? static howitzers should fire quicker than mobile howitzers. i said what markr said to show i agree. so what do you speak about? edit ............. if you mean the replay file when i tested the priest. yes, i no longer have the replay file but mark said the reload is 4 seconds at max...

During the tests I noticed that the static howitzers (both naked and emplaced) have probably the longest reload times - longer than any mobile arty unit. This lowers further their usefulness because they can be counter-shot before they finish their barrage. So this might be another thing to change....