Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

u may teached people, or being more popular than him, u may have better ideas, may be better than him but, he is shadow's best friend. You may add he payed us 100.000$ each as well... thats why we chose him and is a very good recruit for us. Now i can buy my dream boat. ok. tomorrow i pay you $2M b...

Picking someone like Kwok in particular apart from all the other experienced members within the community, and officially assigning him into the dev team apart from everyone else, is simply considered a hell of an insult to almost every other devoted member in this community. so back to the topic. ...

accidentally building the panzer support command twice instead of the panzer jaeger command . good bye 50 fuel. the first thing came to my mind after reading your post, was this: m you just changed "logistic twice" to the "panzer support twice" so i am not sure if this is a coin...

ha. ha. ha. ha. ha.

as you know, the crew of the american 37mm anti tank gun had heavy cover around them from all directions. now there is no heavy cover at all. or just medium cover. pioneers can now quickly kill the crew even from long range. it must be that someone has touched it. otherwise we might have a ghost in ...

Hola! My name is iCaesar, 25 YO swedish guy with a good taste for WW2 RTS-games. I'm a veteran CoH player, played the first game non stop upon it's release until CoH2 came out, then I switched to that. But ultimately got bored of the arcadey feel of CoH2, so I deserted it for other games. But now I...

although it's not on the change.log and im not sure if other people have discovered it or not yet. but im genuinely impressed how you fixed the immortal crew of the american 37mm anti tank gun much better now!

guys. try armored 50.cal airborne jeep at max range vs 222 armored car. then try m20 armored car at max range vs 222 armored car. result: armored 50.cal airborne jeep wins 90% of the times. m20 armored car losses 90% of the times. conclusion: yes there is something wrong. the armored 50.cal jeep is ...

you cant say recce really has same armor as stuart. because there is no turret.

and after the 50cal buff, recce can counter puma now. so i think recce need to be tuned down. it is for sure a bit over the top right now.

yes. nice to see someone finally created topic about this.

cromwell really need to require captain. and other light vehicles should be available right away. so i support.

550 manpower and 4 command points for 7 men with thompson + 2 bazookas and 2 bren lmg ? this will be a bit too cheap i think. also....some very long time ago, sten commando unit used to have bren lmg. do you remember? but the devs changed it. now sten commandos can upgrade thompsons. and now lee enf...

Feel the heat of the deutsche stall this sturmtiger skin is great. i think all skins in bk mod are now awesome. but to be honest, except only 1 skin. the following: tiger.e late.png in my opinion this is the worst skin in the game at the moment. it is the skin of tiger1 ausf.e in blitzkrieg doctrin...

sas should cost 4 command points instead of 6 and 550 manpower instead of 650 but no bren lmgs. only bazookas in the package.

it is very strange to have bren lmg with thompson in the same squad anyway.

the slowdown ability is from the g43 rifles. nothing to do with the lmg42 upgrade.

i think the lmg42 upgrade should cost 85 ammo for both units.
and if normal grenadiers dont have vehicle suppression, they should have it.

why does lmg42 cost 100 ammo for assault grenadiers but only 85 ammo for normal grenadiers??? thats odd.

i also think limit of 105 sherman is fine. and 75 jumbo can maybe stay in infantry doctrine. Looking forward for jumbo changes. yes. but im also looking forward to buildable churchill mk.vii and looking forward to introduction of hold fire ability for most tanks. and also for panther.d to be removed...

The jumbo will have an armor buff against all 7.5 cm KwK 40 L/48 or equivalent from the front, to make it more efficient in its role, its in discussion. if there is armor buff, then it should cost more. maybe the 76 jumbo should become available for 100 fuel and 700 manpower in tank depot and limit...

very good version. the best one this year. but dont forget to update the changelog on the steam store page. great work!

I don't rememeber exactly (possibly it was mentioned here somewhere) the gun could penetrate Tiger at about 700meters but the Tiger could effectively fire at over 2000meters (depends on target for sure but if we speak "Tiger vs Sherman" situation) - here the range issue starts to kick in....

@Viper: Tiger hadnt 200 mm. The alterntive tiger version from Porsche, the Tiger P, had 200 mm. But the Tiger that went into action did not have 200 mm. im sorry to say you are wrong. it did. look: 200mm parts: 200.jpg 140mm parts: 140.jpg 135mm parts: 135.jpg tiger1 frontal turret in 1942 was near...

first. tiger1 never faced jumbo in ww2. and tiger1 frontal armor is more than 100mm thickness. the turret contains some parts with 200mm thickness. but you can't set different armor values for turret and hull in coh. so most coh mod developers agree that the frontal armor of the tiger1 is estimated ...

i wholeheartedly disagree that panther tanks should lose hp and become weaker vs 76 guns in return of cheaper cost. terrible idea. very terrible idea. and i hope not see this idea again. it is very disturbing. but it's good to see how the people agree to make 76 jumbo available in tank depot for 100...

Jumbo can't stand standart Panther ammunition, Tigers or Pz4 with APCR enabled. Battlegroup offers armor, as well as infantry presence for the battlefield with FULL upgrades. And this is not just against Armor doctrine, that you could never though actually, lol. some correction is needed: battlegro...

the tanks bk doctrine get for the same price cant stand a chance vs pershing. and cant bounce off 90mm but the jumbo can kill tigers and panthers thanks to good armor. so. now it is balanced. but if you want to have more than 1 jumbo and be able to bounce off enemy guns even more reliably. then jumb...

ok. so cheap tiger tank = weak tiger tank. right?

so if the jumbo is cheap for only 780 manpower, then why people are crying that it is weak?

cheap jumbo = should also be, weak jumbo. no?

if you want real jumbo. it will cost 100 fuel at least.