Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Yes, but what Pblitz meant was that most people don't have this problem and only a few do. If there was a problem within the game files everyone would experience this. That suggests that the issue is coming from the side of the users that experience the problem. Since we don't have access to the PC...

I was never able to fix the purple missing texture on the sherman gunner, and i tried everything already. this aint normal, if your graphics are set the correct way, the gunner should be visible, if you still have the texture missing, it means your textures files are corrupted. Its just weird that ...

I was never able to fix the purple missing texture on the sherman gunner, and i tried everything already.

I think warhawks already reported such problem with the shotgun in the past, but seems like it got way worse in this patch.

yes canadians plz

Too bad that the unit control of this mod is based on basic cost and limits instead of upkeep right? lol.

All vehicles using PZIV chasis:
Möbelwagen
Wirbelwind
Ostwind
Sturmpanzer Brummbär
Sturmgeschütz IV
Jagdpanzer IV

Viper wrote:stupa is cheap???

Sturmpanzer IV "Stupa" (Sd.Kfz. 166) - 600 MP/100 Fuel/50 Munition

For what it does, its cheap.

Its true what warhawks said, Stupa is currently very broken,its cheap, its a very very powerfull gun with pretty nice accuracy on moving targets (dumb), its not an easy task to destroy it with 76's (magical pz4 chassis/armor)it will also pretty much oneshot your shermans/m10's , experienced players ...

Thats the thing kwok, the live version isn't really stable or balanced... and it also has problems for me is just an "old beta" lol. How much info you get about pershing's new HP when it was in beta ? nothing 'cause no one uses the beta. You will always have complains about it and if is it...

Standardization would be good yes

I’m pretty sure the main reason people don’t play the beta isn’t because they’re too busy. There are many moments when I’ve logged on and there are plenty of people on and willing to play. And when specifically asked to test the beta, their response has been “because it’s _____ (most the time criti...

When are devs gonna realize that making a beta brench for a low population game and letting it there for like 1 month for peopple to test it has been prove to be totally useless most of the time? There isn't just enought peopple to beta tests, most of them who write here are busy doing irl work and ...

- Lowered the HP of Pershing Ace to 1050 (from 1200)
Mmmmmm... this is not good.

I liked the addition of this unit , but i was expecting something way more close of what we see with CW AT boys, this unit is cappable of denying from the start until sherman phase while still doing really nice damage to infantry its a really really well all-around unit (Adding a mp40 was kinda stup...

Not saying the ideas are bad, but one thing to consider is the rock paper scissor effect you’d create by setting up that system. One good thing about formulaic build orders is it’s easier to control unit availability to reduce Rock Paper Scissors effects. That’s why some of the best match ups are U...

Just acknowledging that I read through this and also confirming mencius' mention that it needs to be considered with the general timeline of doc reworks. I also still owe an explanation on the other 5.1.7 patch thread. It's saved in drafts, just never finished and got busy. I don't think that big r...

yeah, me too. At least the core units. Elites such a certain tanks could be expensive to afford and to maintain since they can literally act as a lone unit army like a KT which in most cases can only be killed by off map supports or incredible numerical advantage and luck. True, we can always make ...

Something i had in mind long time ago and a lot of the early balance problems could get fixed by changing the price of unit costs and move it to upkeep costs, while making the tech up more flexible for factions like WH and CW, the examples you gave could be fun for WH, as for CW i would like somethi...

Expect to have weird experiences vs bots, crazy things happens vs them somehow the IA is able to destroy any of your heavy tanks with shitty guns, thats why everyone goes with th's and fortifications vs them 'cause you can cammo them and the IA will just run for it dying in the way.

Mg's and mortars and some other stuff should also get leader squad buffs, i have seen a post where they say its not possible 'cause engine limitations but in the europe at war mod, mg's and mortars squads also get leader buff, and they're pretty strong (the buff).

Free maphacking and sucking resources out of oponnents while being cammo for just 220mp, when is gonna be the day that finally this units gets nerfed and get his cost raised, no one knows.

Hello guys found a map that was uploaded not long ago in the workshop its big enought for bk and it has really good performance in-game-



https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1596925975&searchtext=

No more call-ins plz

¿What are the bonuses that you get on White cover (When an armor is close) for infantry compared to Green cover?

¿Is white cover somehow a 360° cover? Or flanking denies this?