Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Thing is, the Sherman is already hard to destroy using infantry.. even with slow speed... Now the Shermans will be able to effectively hit inf and also. The Shermans speed changes range from 12% slower to 20% faster at the very best. That isn't going to fundamentally change anything except to unify...

Does he uses sherman masses? capability to replace losses quicker to beat opponents My favorite recurring topic. The "lets turn Armor Doctrine into the Sherman Spam Doctrine" topic. It is completely unrealistic to have massed charges of Shermans. The US Army was not the Red Army. The US A...

Hey, YOU there. Panzerblitz1 simply said " if well played in collaboration with your team-mates " and then later you came by claiming that Panzerblitz1 said " in highly collaborative play " So I really wonder where did you get that 'highly' from? Moreover, both his sentences are...

Do you personally have the feeling that Armor doc is somehow super-relying on team in other stuff than dealing with AT guns? As for my personal feelings on Armor doctrine, yes I feel Armor doctrine is super reliant on teammates with dealing with just about anything. I aim to finish games within 30-...

No it is not, "if well played" ---> if well played was to quote in that case Sir, well played , you just skipped the most important word to make this sentence yours I am inventing semantics, am I? You're the one who's trying to equate <U.S. armour doctrine is unique and has all what it ne...

I think Pblitz exagerated when he said " highly collaborative play" These aren't my words, and i never said that, i said <<U.S. armour doctrine is unique and has all what it need to perform well as tank doctrine, this doc is complementary with other U.S. docs, and work great with team mat...

are you telling me that game developers are making balance changes based on feedback from average players? I am telling you that player feedback regardless of ranking is a small factor in balance changes to modern pvp games. The developers have full logs of all battles and the player profile inform...

]I get that, but we cannot balance the game for the scenarios where players don't communicate much. I don't think they should be completely catered to, but they should be kept in mind instead of totally ignored. Actually no game I know, which is aimed at PvP, makes balance changes based on "av...

What makes u pretty sure?? Actually when I do teamspeak games, it's usually seldom.. that's why I mostly record whenever I get on TeamSpeak. As they could be very fun, but don't happen that often... TeamSpeak games are special, but definitely not very frequent. . I have never seen you join a lobby ...

armor doc is a lethal doctrine if well played in collaboration with your team mate. That's exactly why it "does not work". It's too dependent on collaboration. It is all very good and well that some forum users can build stacked teams than fully plan out strategies and contingencies with ...

I think Panzerblitz1 was referring to PvP videos like this (m) or that (m) Where obviously Armor doc dominated everyone... These were not just highlights but rather some serious games full of hardcore BK players from both sides. I know about the pvp videos. My point is that, if you only watch video...

i think Tiger can show you some extreme pawnage in pvp's using U.S. armour doc just to show you that what you're saying or thinking isn't true. "Pwnage" highlight reels are meaningless. I can show you War Thunder clips where biplanes beat jet fighters. Does that justify that biplanes bein...

I don't know how you came up with the statement that best counter doc for armor is Luft and Def. falsim can be easily countered by a simple m4 Sherman and any other tank after the fixed he rounds. Luft's Panther comes late game where armor has pershings.. HE shermans surprise nobody, not even casua...

And do you really think it's fine how the AB bombing run airstrike deals only 10% damage against Bunkers??!! Shouldn't it be at least around 50% damage or something??!! No. Bunkers cost 550MP (which is a shitload of resources) and take long time to build and after you are done building, it still ne...

Redgaarden wrote:Just let it be as it is. I dont think changing anything will do anything for the current balance.

Balance isn't the issue here. It's that the damage model is seemingly inconsistent. 20 MM severely damages the SP but leaves the Pershing untouched? Not very intuitive.

it in such high numbers, is rather insane. 1 US doc, already has as much specialized inf as ALL other Axis doctrines!!! Having to overwhelm with quantity is a massive disadvantage in CoH. But as always Axis main players write this off as a non concern. First off, the micromanagement overhead which ...

MarKr wrote:The new Marine Commandos can crawl all the way to it

Hope they like being instagibbed by a PE mortartrack.

MarKr wrote:, they should perform well at least in some area, this area is killing light vehicles.

It's good realism as well since PIATs historically did well against light vehicles particularly during operation market garden.

The base game isn't so great (mainly because the stock maps are poor) but it does have an excellent western front mod, Heroes of the West.

Destroying emplacements requires micro anyway, all fortified emplacement can be quickly destroyed and decrewed, so i don't see anything really vital for pvp games I agree, demolitions are poor choices to use on emplacements that can be decrewed thus aren't particularly relevant. This leaves them on...

3 charges is needed to destroy a bunker, not 20, if you need more than 3 charges it means that we need to fix it. I am saying in context, globally it takes a large number of uses of the demolition placement ability to destroy anything that isn't a bridge which are mostly irrelevant to pvp anyway I ...

even the 2-3 demolition attempts needed to destroy a regular bunker seems pretty cheesy, Well it is not, and will stay like that for pvp balance issue. And pvp balance is not altered by removing the heavy mortar bunker's vulnerability to demolitions? It is a radical change to increase the number of...

Demolitions not destroying non base buildings in one hit is a realism issue. These are supposed to be units trained in demolition. All demolition teams are trained to destroy structures in one attempt not trial and error. Failing to destroy a structure in one attempt is viewed IRL as a grievous erro...

What's wrong with Luftwaffe is that it now carries no doctrinal risk and that is why it is the king of 1v1s. Huh? I completely disagree, it's true that I often lost against Luft doc in 1vs1 games before.. but just no. Luft doc is absolutely far from being the king of 1v1s anyhow... I am more likely...

I tell you that there is a counter to it and your response is that it is not economical...well you can invest 660MP and 70 fuel to protect emplacements and soldiers in trenches worth much more. Or you can make the defensive line and ask allies to provide some AA around to protect it (all other US d...