Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Lolz shadow... necropost.

I think that devs has already heard about boys so many times that they will change it finally .

I wasn't joking... And you are odious.

Poor Hawks. As I read your posts throughout this forum, I have such an impression: You have treated this mod like your very good friend. You were both having a great time together. Bk was a different from other friends, he was more entertaining, the emotions were more intense... He let you develop y...

You are right. I have nothing more to say .

MoW creators might have managed to achieve some higher level of authenticity but I highly doubt that their work in 100% reflects the reality Isn't higher better than lower? Is MoW bad just because it's MoW? IF we changed all that stuff to match the MoW we wouldn't get more realistic BK, we would si...

Der Major wrote:aha... PAnzer is the generic german Term for tank.. so it should one hit all tanks?

I know German enough to know ;D. When I mean "panzer" I mean all variants of panzer IV .

Wolf wrote: again, why does that matter?

I don't know why they stared talking about that. It seems like there is no way that people could stick to the topic. They always start talking about other things and the thread dies meanwhile...

I am not professor but 238mm at 100 metres to much for 76mm WWII gun, you dont think so? I still don't get what is your problem. First you say to use proper sources, but you don't provide any of them. you dont think so? at 0 this gun have 270? Stop inventing new guns. M4A3E8 unstoppable The gun of ...

You banned in google? There are many sources and they have differences but also differences in War Thunder and MoW much stronger than usual. Different countries have different calculate mechanics, And there is no overall 100% correct numbers. Stop Using games like wiki, they always some balance shi...

War Thunder data shit. Only armor data good. Oh, I am sorry that I don't keep a Hellcat next to a KT on my backyard, so I could see if it penetrates it... I am using what is available to me. Both WT and WoT are not some shitty games, they are in some degree considered realistic ones. Additionally t...

maybe try to be a bit more balanced next time I am afraid you don't understand. I aimed for REALISM, pure realism, not for balance. Therefore I have stated that these are not ideas for in-game solutions, I just compared the Bk values with """realistic""" MoW values. fu...

Thing with schreck and zooks is that we can give either this more realistic penetration or the current range, accuracy etc. But realistic pen with current behaviour would make hendheld weapons OP. I would prefer more realism here: good pen but lower range and accuracy vs moving targets). I agree, i...

Just from briefly looking, I don't really believe KT armor, against stuff like SP and 17pdr. Hellcat and Comet also seems to be way too useless in that regard. One thing that you can't forgot, that in BK you can't aim for the "weaker spots" and that side armor is partly accounted in penet...

Without special rounds it was impossible for PAK 40 to penetrate Churchill with 152 mm or frontal armor. I didn't perform the test for Churchill IV thou. If you guys want, and think that it has some sense I can do more tests. I have a few ideas. For example Stuart gun, Greyhound gun, all kinds of sh...

1) pzschreck. From what I know it can bounce.** Yes, of course, by my statement I just wanted to show that in real life panzershreck could penetrate all allied tanks, which also had no extreme slops that could cause a bounce. Of course in some battle situation bounce could occur, for example a turn...

Hello! I decided make an experiment to check all those many times discussed things like Tiger vs bazookas, vs 76 at gun; Jumbo armor etc. If you are interested keep scrolling, it's going to be a long post. (not my fault, no spoilers option...) First of all I will say that I did that for fun . I don'...

XAHTEP39 wrote:Don`t check and compare phisical pheomena of HEAT on different comp. games... It is absurdly...

Why not? What other option do I have?

XAHTEP39 wrote:Maybe you just a young and didn`t understand my reasoning?

Excuse me?

Ok, I have done the test: here is the result (and this is pretty ironic for me). Bazooka should have 0% chance to penetrate jagdpanzer and hetzer from front. You guys were right ;D. It seems like slop matters . Here are 2 photos of the experiment Thanks for the clarification. Should I say now "...

I am gonna test it in Men of War, and I will tell you if you are right or wrong ;D.

XAHTEP39 wrote:Just the ''art of war XX" is my hobby of long standing, including WWII of course. And i am soldier IRL.

Yea, but can you give us a source where we can read about that 60* is extreme angle?

Is that your private uniform and cat ;D?

XAHTEP39 Here, I will post it again. I found it on wikipedia, if you have some other source please share it with us. If the projectile travels very fast, and thus is in a state of hypervelocity, the strength of the armour material becomes negligible – as by the impact both projectile and armour wil...

I am just sorry that such a discussion occurred in my topic. All I wanted to know was what was bazooka efficiency vs tank destroyers. I also added that in reality it was high vs less armored vehicles. That's all.

This not 100% correct. First, Something like RPG can bounce vs sloped armor, RPG not mean 100% explosion. Second, Slope armor mean more real millimeters that need to be penetrate. m Look B You might be right, I haven't read much about this matter yet. As far as I know HEAT was capable to penetrate ...

MarKr wrote:I'm kinda busy right now since I have to study for my state exam which will take place in 2 weeks but I'll check it when I get time...

Sure, thanks in advance .