Search found 162 matches
- 02 Jun 2017, 04:20
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: ALL COH GAMES -75% until monday 10am
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11266
Re: ALL COH GAMES -75% until monday 10am
the update states that there is improvement to modding support, what exactly did they do to help or improve it?
- 02 Jun 2017, 04:18
- Forum: General Discussions on Strategy and Theory
- Topic: PvP tactics, and key units.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17972
Re: PvP tactics, and key units.
the marines did not fight in Europe, they were in the Pacific theatre
- 01 Jun 2017, 06:12
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: COH 10th anniversary Tiger cake
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9789
Re: COH 10th anniversary Tiger cake
Awesome!
- 27 May 2017, 22:32
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: desync fixed/solved.
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6462
Re: desync fixed/solved.
Ive found having the weakest computer host greatly helps the desync, but doesnt solve it
- 26 May 2017, 03:44
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Demo charges vs bunkers
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2889
Re: Demo charges vs bunkers
US engineers and WH pioneers are not the only ones with the demo ability. The attack does represent a surface attack from the original intent of vcoh to destroy bridges which would also be surface based. The material used is reminiscent of comp b, very similar to TNT. Proper planning would require m...
- 25 May 2017, 17:31
- Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
- Topic: Demo charges vs bunkers
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2889
Re: Demo charges vs bunkers
Realistically engineers would take the time to do the job right in 1 shot to destroy or damage enough to render the object too costly to repair or salvage. In combat this may not be possible and so they would have to improvise. The bunkers were built like nothing else back then. Surface explosions w...
- 21 May 2017, 03:31
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Bug or no...?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 942
Re: Bug or no...?
Do you by chance have your desktop set to windows classic?
- 21 May 2017, 03:29
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4460
Re: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
My statement was under the assumption that mass production was enabled. It does not take much to get to that point. The J does not get any reduction. The difference between the two is then 40 MP and 10 fuel
- 20 May 2017, 20:03
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod has been Greenlit!
- Replies: 127
- Views: 43759
Re: Blitzkrieg Mod on Steam VOTE!
Not that we'll ever get the answers, but Im curious about why 30% of the people down voted
- 20 May 2017, 18:15
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4460
Re: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
Is there a difference between the build times between the J and the H? I feel the resources needed are too close and I always go with the H over the J. Maybe making the J faster than the H would also help give it a buff that is not on the battlefield.
- 18 May 2017, 03:38
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - AT boys commando
- Replies: 41
- Views: 6718
Re: CW - AT boys commando
Id prefer fighting 2 boys teams vs 1 infantry section, easy kills
- 17 May 2017, 06:45
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Suggestions for AI behavior
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9842
Re: Suggestions for AI behavior
i play some infantry only, at least once a week. Say an HMG team dies it will sit there and not be recrewed by say the engineers nearby.
- 17 May 2017, 03:21
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: Suggestions for AI behavior
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9842
Re: Suggestions for AI behavior
I somehow missed this topic the first go round. I would like to see the AI be able to recrew equipment. Never seen them take their base defense over once the crew is killed. Same goes for HMG, mortar, etc. CW seems to have issues placing their vehicles sometimes. It is either in the perfect place or...
- 16 May 2017, 05:41
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - HQ commando gliders : Sten or Lee-Enfield ?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3574
Re: CW - HQ commando gliders : Sten or Lee-Enfield ?
having an early parachute unit would be rather cool
- 15 May 2017, 18:55
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod 4.9.8 Patch
- Replies: 65
- Views: 59375
Re: Blitzkrieg Mod 4.9.8 Patch
Its not that the commando glider needs reworking just tweaks like the lee enfield vs sten and the call in cost could be lowered a bit
- 13 May 2017, 21:52
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - AT boys commando
- Replies: 41
- Views: 6718
Re: CW - AT boys commando
I was thinking more from the gliders in enemy territory, 17pder wont last long and isnt very mobile, being able to break the treads has a much greater range than any grenade in terms of stopping the advance and not necessarily destroying. It would be simpler to the pak38 where it still has use in la...
- 13 May 2017, 19:38
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - AT boys commando
- Replies: 41
- Views: 6718
Re: CW - AT boys commando
For RAF I might have agree with the tread breaker, RAF units do not have much to counter heavy armor
- 12 May 2017, 17:01
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - AT boys commando
- Replies: 41
- Views: 6718
Re: CW - AT boys commando
What about removing them and replacing them with a commando sapper type unit so there is a unit that can repair use flamethrowers?
- 10 May 2017, 17:09
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: WH Blitz Stormtroopers
- Replies: 2
- Views: 810
WH Blitz Stormtroopers
I never noticed until the other night that the basic stormtroopers have two different costs depending on if you call them in from off map or build them from the HT. Is it suppose to be that way?
- 10 May 2017, 17:03
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: CW - HQ commando gliders : Sten or Lee-Enfield ?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3574
Re: CW - HQ commando gliders : Sten or Lee-Enfield ?
Same here, be a great reward unit switch
- 07 May 2017, 23:08
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod 4.9.8 Patch
- Replies: 65
- Views: 59375
Re: Blitzkrieg Mod 4.9.8 Patch
Thank you for the work, want to specifically thank the price drop on the Victors HMG team and surprised about the MG42 HMG team
Greenlight steam announcement is what tipped me off about the new patch
Am I to assume that the PE TH PZ IV F1 and SE PZ III N are still purchasable in infantry only mode?
Greenlight steam announcement is what tipped me off about the new patch
Am I to assume that the PE TH PZ IV F1 and SE PZ III N are still purchasable in infantry only mode?
- 27 Apr 2017, 16:22
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: 4.9.6+ USAF vs Luftwaffe
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5084
Re: 4.9.6+ USAF vs Luftwaffe
I'd have to agree. I love playing Luf, but have seen against RAF where vet 3+ units constantly getting overwhelmed and slowly not able to replace the losses. Rather interesting fights to watch sometimes.
- 27 Apr 2017, 16:14
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: 210mm Nebelwerfers
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3558
Re: 210mm Nebelwerfers
I'm against raising the cost as it is high already. PE SE is glass cannon to me. All offensive and very little defensive wise. A couple well placed M4 Shermans can take out SE since they have no real heavy armor. I've seen the 120mm mortar team make or break lines and bases, especially if there are ...
- 22 Apr 2017, 18:44
- Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
- Topic: US officer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1489
Re: US officer
I agree with the secondly as compared to other officers they just stand around too much, but I like the 7 man rifle squad call in. an additional 60mp for 1 extra person and 2 BARs is worth it I feel
- 20 Apr 2017, 04:20
- Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
- Topic: CW - Royal Artillery doctrine: tips & advice
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3827
Re: CW - Royal Artillery doctrine: tips & advice
Took a huge gamble moving and delaying my start, but it paid off in the end. Not something I'd recommend every time, but thought it would be a good example. It was orchestrated ahead of time with my teammates whom had to cover me and what I could have done early game. It was safe to say a quick matc...