Search found 244 matches

by Redgaarden
04 Aug 2017, 15:41
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Allies suggestion
Replies: 30
Views: 1503

Re: Allies suggestion

I mean at least the US faction is more comprehensive, US doesn't lack airplanes for example, but WH does! Also, US still has heavy tanks and even super heavy tanks just like the WH faction, and US also has enough elite and specialized inf units in both AB and inf docs. I mean at least WH faction is...
by Redgaarden
03 Aug 2017, 14:44
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Satchel charge for WH?
Replies: 32
Views: 1325

Re: Satchel charge for WH?

I dont think it's ok for 17 punder ANTI TANK emplacement to reliably one hit kill elite squads. But hey they are nerfing the accuaracy next patch. I would like them to tone down the explosion a bit too though.
by Redgaarden
02 Aug 2017, 22:05
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Satchel charge for WH?
Replies: 32
Views: 1325

Re: Satchel charge for WH?

I will post soon why I think tiger is right and many of you sound like gibberish.

"I have yet to play the online to realize the full effect of what I am saying"

Cya soon. -Red
by Redgaarden
29 Jul 2017, 16:01
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 28
Views: 1022

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Well, Snipers are super tanky so you need elite infantry to kill them since pgrens will just run straight at the sniper get minimum range, sniper retreats and survives with 10% health. So usually sniper is a counter to ALL infantry and not just elites. P.s I had a weird thing where my full health lu...
by Redgaarden
29 Jul 2017, 00:46
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 28
Views: 1022

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

The M16 has 315. Is there something hidden? Maybe with overrepair, idk how much more HP it gives. I think overrepair is 125 extra hp when fully overrepaired. Only jeep varaints recieve 75 all other vehicles get vehicles_overrepair_Medium (M16, Shermans, Pershings,) which is I think 125 extra hp. I ...
by Redgaarden
28 Jul 2017, 21:37
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Need your help tracking forbidden symbols
Replies: 8
Views: 875

Re: Need your help tracking forbidden symbols

My plane wreck are never visible. I can find some screen shots later.
by Redgaarden
28 Jul 2017, 21:35
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 28
Views: 1022

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

The M16, the axis 251 and 251 with 37 mm have 315 HP. So think they are all equal so far. damage is 50-90 for US and 50 to 80 for axis. No real difference here. I think the M16 has 415 hp which makes it survive alot of things. You talk about AT guns? They are hard to vet anyways unless a 17 pdr kil...
by Redgaarden
28 Jul 2017, 21:28
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Stuka vs Trench
Replies: 6
Views: 338

Re: Stuka vs Trench

How do you destroy a hole? Shouldn't the bomb just make the hole bigger?
by Redgaarden
27 Jul 2017, 12:09
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 28
Views: 1022

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Glad to hear Warhawks. 1. I was better with the 37 mm against pumas. Having two or so gives more hit changes, covers more area and better protection to each AT gun. Over that the 37 mm has a higher rate of fire. I like the 57 mm AT against slower halftracks or general support. But my weapon of choic...
by Redgaarden
27 Jul 2017, 11:56
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 249
Views: 12097

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

So, I totally understand that realism comes 2nd and gameplay comes 1st. But even from a gameplay point of view... It's not logical if u would say that the IVH/J need to be faster just so they could be able to flank Pershing tanks. Claiming that otherwise they would be easily killed from distance by...
by Redgaarden
27 Jul 2017, 00:46
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 28
Views: 1022

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Haven't read a single thing. BUT I think we can move this topic somewhere else. You dont build 57 against tanks, you use it against pumas.
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 19:36
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 249
Views: 12097

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

I want to just caution making vehicle speeds to fast in general. Relative speeds to each other, I like the decisions made because it will get towards that desired gameplay level that you described Markr. One thing to keep in mind is relative speeds to other non-armor units. CoH2 is seen as very car...
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 13:51
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 249
Views: 12097

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

- Demolition charges should now destroy any building next to which you plant the charge in one explosion (applies to US Engineers, WM Pios, Storm demo squad, CW Sappers(+RE sappers), Commandos, Sturm pios, Luft Pios) Could you replace US Airborne Engineer's demo ability since that one can't even be...
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 13:33
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 32
Views: 1348

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Vehicle speeds... Hmm, this is such a controversial topic in BK Mod. But did anyone recently complain about any tank being too slow or too fast??!! As far as I am concerned; No! Therefore I believe that there is really no need to touch the speed of any vehicles. Speeds in BK Mod currently might not...
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 01:03
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 32
Views: 1348

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Whats the point of the Pershing ace? Sure, bit different stats than basic pershing. But what can it provide what Jumbo/jacks/Pershing cant? I mean you say it isnt a good idea. So what exactly gives you an Ace you couldnt do with other units in this doc? Besides that i personally always felt that th...
by Redgaarden
25 Jul 2017, 19:33
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 32
Views: 1348

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

And I would be happy to see combat engineers in armour doctrine. But I feel a little sad to remove my favourite unit away from infantry doctrine. But I wouldn't mind removing Rangers from the game. Whats your fav unit? Jumbo or 105? If its the 105 i knew that calli jeep would be moved to inf doc. S...
by Redgaarden
25 Jul 2017, 13:16
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 32
Views: 1348

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

What are we going to fill the void of infantry doctrine 105 sherman unlock? And also. Could we get some sandbags or something for infantry doctrine regular shermans so they can't be 1hit killed by most axis armour? And I would be happy to see combat engineers in armour doctrine. But I feel a little ...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 02:21
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 37mm AT's
Replies: 10
Views: 363

Re: 37mm AT's

When is the cannister better than the HE? Remember that you can use HE even againts Inf on buildings and shoot like 3-4 times. It would be fine if its just like a 1 shoot hability each time you use it (like in tanks) but this is not the case. I think they wanted to do this before but it didnt happe...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 01:27
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Good example of Armor doc
Replies: 19
Views: 795

Re: Good example of Armor doc

I once tried to use command tank abilities ( not in this game) they cost muni and they should provide timed buffs of various kind, tho i tried the defensive one 3-4 times and i must have been very unlucky cause my tanks still got hit 100% of times. I gives a 0.25 recieved accuracy bonus. When tanks...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 01:10
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 37mm AT's
Replies: 10
Views: 363

Re: 37mm AT's

I prefer HE over cannister since cannister only does 40dmg and has a 80% chance to kill a 0 hp enemy. its all situational, both have their pros and cons over each. I am not saying it happens often, but there has been an occasion where I wish I had the other ability I'm assuming that the "other ...
by Redgaarden
21 Jul 2017, 03:13
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 27
Views: 1202

Re: Armor doctrine

Hey panzer, can you give us some stats comparition between E8 and 76W please? I know the gun has 0.75 movement modifier instead of 0.50 and that HVAP deals 5 more dmg (multiplied by 5) than regular 76 it has a bit more hp, used to have 700 I think, but got toned down a bit for some reason. Dont kno...
by Redgaarden
20 Jul 2017, 17:17
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 954

Re: The Artillery Talk

Thats interesting. Isnt it the case that many hate it when all their tanks get all the time wrecked by the rocket arty? And now it shall be only a threat exactly to them. I'm speaking on behalf of the more lighter variants like regular shermans and armored cars that get killed by stray rockets. The...
by Redgaarden
19 Jul 2017, 20:23
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 954

Re: The Artillery Talk

Ive got a whole set of ideas that could make the terror doctrine into a largely rocket artillery focused doctrine with lots of upgrades that could boost them. Including maybe even an upgrade called "increased rocket production" that would lower salvo costs. Also increased rocket artillery...
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 15:52
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 2831

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Tiger1996 wrote:
Redgaarden wrote:P.s how do I quote the name of a person? I noticed all my quotes lack the name of the person I'm quoeting.
{quote="example"} text {/quote} :)

But surely use [ ] instead of { } ^^


Thank you. Think I got the hang of it now.
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 12:11
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 2831

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Then someone says that Armor doc NEEDS something but you cannot agree on what it is...Shanks says the Armor needs arty, Redgaarden says that Armor desperately needs good infantry and some anti-emplacement and also AA. Really guys I'm saying I dont want more artillery for armour doc and pointing out...

Go to advanced search