Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Dear Comrades, The Tiger could shoot farther and with greater accuracy than any other allied tank and this is not realistically displayed in the modern versions. Best regards Tanks have not such such power. Crews have, and a coh/bk time germans crews were poors. I don't know if it was intention or ...

At this time,overall, there is no weak rear armour for heavies. Mostly it is harder to pen rear heavies armour than it would be. It is especially true for super heavy. For exemple just consider any gun would have the same chance to pen side or rear tiger armour than it would have to pen frontally a ...

Someone seems work hard to raise Tiger and panther armour when really far worst situation exist on allies side.
Even situation slowly become better, There is still lot of issues with TT at bk. If peoples start passionate debat for each bug/glitch they find it will quickly become a mess.

At guns are imo enough small and low profil to hide about everywhere except perhaps red area. We can fairly imagine such AT gun also use foliage and / or camo nets. On my side I made only one exception for the Pak 43 who is really very big. However I m in a logic process, not in a pvp one.

It will not.
But you can hope to reduce desynch risk.

You dont seems to understand that bk is a pur pvp mod. Like said you re even very lucky inf only is still supported.

It is a long time now BK have been hijacked by pvp community. That means if solo gamer want to play BK for solo game, they have to play it like it is.

Infantry only is typical a solo or multi coop game, Winterflaw. Nobody play it in pvp.

You can even be happy it exists at BK. It is the lone solo activity still updated by BK team.

However it is just an adaptation of the main game. A true infantry only would require a dedicated mod.

It is an unknow problem from me, sorry, I cant help.

Tiger1996 wrote:50.cal is already effective against scout cars

It is far from what it should be. BK made effort to update mg 42 to historical value, but not so much on the cal .50.

I would like to propose a new game type. (I have no idea if this is technically possible.) The game begins with everyone having a full army at their base - so say the usual 150 pop cap. There are then *no* new units and *no* reinforcement. So you have to play to conserve your troops. It means no pa...

Looking especially your second picture, it is obvious your computer use alcohol in excess, and perhaps even drugs.

It sound like a confusion between two differents situations. 1) your HQ is destroyed or AI HQ is destroyed ; AI send its units around the wrecked HQ until reparation is complete. 2) After playing a certain amount of time AI spawn vehicles/Tanks but its accumulate around the spawning factories and th...

I found that for you

https://www.gamewatcher.com/mods/compan ... -open-beta

IIRC 4.64 was for sure old school bk, but I think transition was around 4.70 - 4.71. So this one is probably what you wish.

Hi Adam

My advice ; never play with (allied cpu) or against Brits. On an other hand you can play yourself Brits. Despite Wolfcz appreciated efforts, british are, at least, unreliable.

One central voice for the mod dev, is something reasonable. However for maps having a stand alone section is not a threat for the core mod cohesion itself. If it can be made inside official team it is better, but it means recruit. Slowly kill community and mod ... Because over years you fell it dyna...

Very simple; in a pvp organisation, someone convinced of cheating is usually sanctioned. Usually his name is deleted from the ranking board. It dont means he cant play anymore. It means he cant be ranked and by way any people played with or against him will have no point from a game. In reality it m...

If people want to give up freedom (by lazyness or stupidity ?) it is there problem. Except for a paranoiac, there is no real reason to play exclusivly map labelled bk mod tip. PVP organisation is between low to existant at bk. There is no map testing or mapking staff, and anyway ; who for work on it...

What you said was already done jails... and ? Devs said FY we dont want your 3v3 field of engagement maps ? yeeeeeep.... prettyyyy muchhhh...... Mapmaking have not to be under devs control. If it is integrated in a whole structure (pvp organisation) it have to be a separated department. In some pvp...

What you said was already done jails... and ? Devs said FY we dont want your 3v3 field of engagement maps ? I m aware about pvp maps specificity. Perhaps hard to believe but I had been a pvp map designer (not at coh) and also pvp map validator. Point bridge maps are also bad maps for compstomp. Not...

IIRC Veule les roses exist in 3vs3 and 4 vs 4.

What you need is ; start a deal with bk devs (perhaps maps creators). Then, if it is successful start to work on worldbuilder to make 3 vs 3 version from existing 4 v 4.

Summary stop whinning and start working.

It is half a month s pay in Burundi. Hmm perhaps is it the explanation why you have no burundi peoples at BK forum.

Your title is rather strange since you suggest peoples love God or/and the inverse. We lack of evidences about that. Second, if peoples refuse to play 3vs3 on 4v4 map, there is no problem. They play 3v3 on 3v3 maps I presume. If you want to play 4v4 you just need to have at least 7 friends. But real...

kwok wrote:trying to design factions/doctrines more specialized or well rounded?

Cracked disk spotted

Damage. Jalis its the contrary, the Pzb39 historically had more penetration power than the Boys anti-tank rifle, but the model will be set to match the mod meta and the mod balance, the Pzb39 in Bk will not be superior to the Boys AT rifle for sure. You missed the question , I think, so I ask again...

Damage. Have you decided an acceptable historical distortion (for balance) ; pzb39 - boys, same damage same cost, or will the pzb39 be less efficient due to very small projectile ?