Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

storms with 2 stg, 4 mp40 standard loadout.

and i think the commands points needed for evasive maneuvers is too much.

is he aware 76 sherman cost in armor only 1 command point right now?
how will it be 5 command points if we add 2 more ? he needs to use a calculator.

panzer4 ausf.h require 4 points in blitzkrieg doctrine. just for his information.

this subject was discussed many times within different topics......but thanks for creating it.

what's there to say......delay 76 shermans by 3 more command points in all american doctrines.
except for armor doctrine, 2 more command points only.

I dare to say that we keep the "ideology". However, you expected us to do it differently than we did it. the ideology you are taking is far from the presumed one. i will not argue about the "ways" because it can be done in many different ways. but the way you choose to implement...

AB faces BK doc: Panther and Ostwind or something similiar (when the map leaves space to maneuver)-> AB is in serious trouble Armor faces 88 guns: Locked down. you are taking sides here, and no surprise....only the side you favor, the allied side. i talked more generally without specifying any exam...

it's not about what units to rush or what else......you started this beta with clear ideology....to make doctrines more well rounded for 1vs1 games.....but you are not following this ideology. look at your new doctrines and compare them with the old ones.....the old ones were much stronger, more ver...

you dont need to revert the changes, just leave the game alone......or keep 518 *re-mess* on beta forever so people can always get back to 517 and play.

and dont act like nobody told you before in details why 518 is worse.....you only listen to your parts of the feedback.

can't describe it any better



MODERATOR EDIT: Topic moved here from the "Balancing & Suggestions" section as it is a complaint in nature which does not suggest anything new for balancing.

why panzer.iii is not fixed?

and 76 sherman not delayed?

nice work

can somebody reskin the tiger tank from blitzkrieg doctrine? the late version?
the skin is very bad, unless historical add on is used.

By looking at the list of changes, I would say that many docs in their 2016 iteration look way more playable than the beta ones. Though, the trend for making the docs well-rounded is certainly welcomed. However, it’s not implemented properly at the moment. very agreed. i think too 517 has better ba...

Gosh, i am so close that my barrel touches the enenie td already. Where did he go? He disappeared in front of my barrel oO. lets not forget 60 range in the game = 1 km in reality. so if you are like 40 range away.....you are still not too close. but more detection range can fix this anyway. and spo...

current rehide time is more than 15 seconds. tank hunters are sitting ducks. no point to camouflage when you can always see where they are hiding.

delay 76 shermans and less ammo upkeep is necessary. But the 76 gun needs to get buffed at least against Tank IV f2 and stubbies. In fights today i managed to take out 76 shermans head on with normal F2 which costs no CP and is cheaper than regular shermans. If i pay 3 CP for a 76 sherman, i do wan...

Alone the fact that all WH factions would have these AT rifles again would people think tiwce getting vehicles at all or not. Doesnt matter how low HP they have, if they have an M40 or whatnot. Its simply that they can appear anywhere (houses etc) anytime (sprint), without much risk as you can retr...

i think after the nerf to the anti tank rifle boys.....less accuracy? less hp? less range? and removal of anti tank grenade? moved to barracks? no mp40?
they will not dominate light vehicles anymore when they are allowed in all wehrmacht doctrines again.

because at the moment they are over nerfed.

I agree that at rifle should stay in all wh docs. 50 cal buff means that now two 0.50 jeeps can kill axis players up to tier 3 if they manage to outmanoeuvre paks and light at vehicles (like 28mm car which sometimes dies to one 0.50 magazine). "Balance" + i think developers should listen ...

usa has 50cal so they dont need anti tank boys
50 cal is better against light vehicles

i like the initiative of the new changes and i agree with markr on how players need to forget old formulas and start developing new ways to play. but i see what tiger is trying to imply on his post. the changes are aiming to make the game pace "slower" by tuning down most units, although i...

105 howitzers have no problem now in beta. i meant they should just always cost high upkeep (10 or higher) and never get lower. because this idea about ammo upkeep mainly came to reduce opness of 105 howitzers. and i have question.....range of stupa anti fortification long shot is 80 and stuh has 85...

105 howitzers are so op. please give them high upkeep.

mp40 can beat m1 garand or m1 carbine but loses against sten, grease and thompson......not mainly because it is weaker than all of them but because it is at best not stronger......but also because mp40 is available always in lower numbers per unit. so you will usually face 6 free grease/6 sten/6 tho...

question,

does improved fortifications unlock affect bunkers or only emplacements?

Tiger1996 wrote:- Or disallow SE doc Demo squad from crawling with it... So, there won't be any squad that can crawl with Shrecks.

this should mean if marine commandos grab shrecks they will not crawl too......

i think 8 command point for priest in infantry doctrine is too much.....and 5 command points for jumbo is too little...... how about to swap 1 command point from priest unlock to jumbo unlock? so priest will need 7 points and jumbo or jackson will need 6 points......also, increase fuel cost for jumb...