Search found 4077 matches

by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 23:39
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW tank hunter underperforming vs medium tanks
Replies: 10
Views: 200

Re: CW tank hunter underperforming vs medium tanks

Lionelus wrote: ↑02 Nov 2020, 02:50 So basically, you 1 shot pz4 and stug, if you do 636 to 650 damage. That's 14 RNG possibilities From 450 to 635, that makes 185 RNG possibilities (not 1-shooting) Thus, 14 / 185 = 0.075. So when a Firefly or Achilles is shooting at a pz4 or a stug, you got a 7.5%...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 23:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
Replies: 34
Views: 666

Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal

Yes, and if you read my other posts the chance to hit them even from somewhat closer distances are a bigger issue or lets say more frustrating issue. Its more annoying to see my shermans fail from like 35 range-40 range all the time as it is to see them bounce from a hetzer from 60 range away. I mea...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 22:30
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
Replies: 34
Views: 666

Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal

How many of you guys here did play the current beta, and if played, how many games? I cant since i am currently in Berlin and not at home. But in the old Beta the Hetzers and IV/48´s were rare (in the past most Hetzers got used by Luftwaffe and TH doc, now one doc is completely reworked with TD spa...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 22:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
Replies: 34
Views: 666

Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal

If the devs prefer this I am willing to compromise, but I personally feel that being vulnerable to both 76mm tanks and inf is going too far, these tanks should at least be good at fighting 76 shermans. The Increase i suggested was just 2-4 percantage points. But i am agreeing with you. The M18 and ...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 21:47
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
Replies: 32
Views: 760

Re: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions

no, shermans and pz4 should be on same level Which Pz IV? D,E,F,H,J? Do you know how many PZ IV versions exists? Its basically a whole new tank. I think its not fair when the german Jagdpanzers have gotten such massive holes in their armor while the real problem was the endless stream of cheap Tank...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 20:21
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: New Suggestions for Beta
Replies: 9
Views: 194

Re: New Suggestions for Beta

sure. How to counter these panzerschreck ninjas. Once we had ideas of giving all AT squads crawl ability. But i hated them since you can basically only find them with recons. Recon vehicles will only find them but then then die. It would be a no brain investment which will most likely always pay off...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 20:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW tank hunter underperforming vs medium tanks
Replies: 10
Views: 200

Re: CW tank hunter underperforming vs medium tanks

I think Panther lowest damage is 100 right? What if the damage of 17 pdr would be 100-130 as well instead of 90-130? Just a thought to increase the average damage. The command Tank/Vehicle is another topic. They are unpractical due to their short AoE which makes any microing a though job. The 0.94 a...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 20:09
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal
Replies: 34
Views: 666

Re: BETA: 76mm revisions, TD and AT Inf change proposal

1. Almost yes. I would increase chances by a tiny bit (like 56-58% vs Hetzer and 65% vs IV/48 and arround 45% vs IV/70). 2. Not sure. I like to have some units like these which can support some doctrines in a very special way but being squishy). So i wouldnt do that perhaps. Or only increase ammo fo...
by Warhawks97
02 Nov 2020, 19:54
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
Replies: 32
Views: 760

Re: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions

@Markr: What i hated most was that you fail to hit even from pretty close ranges. I had tanks dancing arround a single hetzer and kept failing. The long range accuracy should get fixed. The pen against these two tanks was quite ok. They dont get spammed like F´s or even Tank IV H or J and they dont ...
by Warhawks97
30 Oct 2020, 21:32
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Should starting resources be standardized?
Replies: 11
Views: 249

Re: Should starting resources be standardized?

If we change building costs, what the point then to standardize them. I think factions have or had on purpose different starting res. Like PE being thus able to field vehicles earlier than others. WH and US could have easily equal res, esspecially since both have pretty much the same starting capabi...
by Warhawks97
30 Oct 2020, 13:43
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
Replies: 32
Views: 760

Re: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions

No, dont add HE to the TD´s. We dont need Stug 2.0. These tanks are supposed to stop tanks and i am afraid they wont be better in doing this anymore than former M10 even though they still have somewhat better armor. I liked the Tankyness which wasnt too OP and they lack anti inf stuff which is good ...
by Warhawks97
29 Oct 2020, 22:43
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions
Replies: 32
Views: 760

Re: Beta 5.2.2 First Reactions

hmm. Hetzers and IV/48 have not been a super big issue. I mean yes, they made camping gameplay super easy, but a better option would have been if tanks were actually able when staying basically right next to these tanks when flanking them. Also these tanks are in doctrines which are not known for ki...
by Warhawks97
28 Oct 2020, 22:17
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
Replies: 24
Views: 689

Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic

1. Really high crit chance (around 75%). - While it would take many shots to actually kill something, taking the enemy medium's combat effectiveness away would force the axis player to either back up or stay engaged and wait for reinforcements to continue the push, risking destruction if the 57mm c...
by Warhawks97
27 Oct 2020, 18:50
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
Replies: 24
Views: 689

Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic

i am honestly against the damage change. So far this was one "BK standard" that the damage guns had were mutiplied by 5. Thus the damage difference between weapons with bigger shells stayed logically higher. This is one reason why i dont like AT rifles at all bc they have such a insane high damage f...
by Warhawks97
26 Oct 2020, 23:14
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
Replies: 24
Views: 689

Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic

It doesn't seem people are too interested in this topic, there is no consensus on this topic so the upcoming beta will not change anything about the medium AT gun performance. The one after that might bring some changes if there is more interest in this topic. I'll leave here another idea, maybe it...
by Warhawks97
25 Oct 2020, 00:25
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 6pdr/57mm separate topic
Replies: 24
Views: 689

Re: 6pdr/57mm separate topic

Bumpity bump. sounds like people are not happy with the axis mid game med tank rush/spam. One proposed solution on the other threads was to improve mid game AT. Revisiting this thread as one potential solution. The 57 should provide good protection against early tank IV models, including F2. That a...
by Warhawks97
25 Oct 2020, 00:19
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: The current Problem with armor balance. Why everyone is upset with allied armor
Replies: 7
Views: 608

Re: The current Problem with armor balance. Why everyone is upset with allied armor

PS: Could you upload more PVP games throughout the next month? I am currently unable to play myself bc i am not at home for over a month and need some entertainment. Problem is i'm busy with university.. but i will try ^^ Glad you enjoy those vids ;) they are in my opinion the best pvp BK vids on y...
by Warhawks97
24 Oct 2020, 20:38
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Tiger Ace
Replies: 7
Views: 257

Re: Tiger Ace

I repeat myself:

Remove all 0 fuel call ins except aces,

Aces will be a one time call in only. Once lost you cant get it back.
by Warhawks97
19 Oct 2020, 21:02
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: The current Problem with armor balance. Why everyone is upset with allied armor
Replies: 7
Views: 608

Re: The current Problem with armor balance. Why everyone is upset with allied armor

Bumping this topic with this cool new nice video. Many thx to Tiger for sharing his games with us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8ZZFRjER-8 PS: Could you upload more PVP games throughout the next month? I am currently unable to play myself bc i am not at home for over a month and need some entert...
by Warhawks97
19 Oct 2020, 19:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 11
Views: 286

Re: [US] Structural changes

- Why does WSC requires motorpool? I needed to add some time into teching without blocking the production of light vehicles, wich is why i removed motorpool upgrade, supply yard as sepparated building and made the WSC the building that makes you tier up into building Tank depot. Ok, what about keep...
by Warhawks97
19 Oct 2020, 13:03
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 11
Views: 286

Re: [US] Structural changes

like it.

But why does WSC requires motorpool?


Just asking.


And could the chaffe be in the Tank depot or available after it?

It would cost not more than a stuart in return and these two tanks wouldnt be reward units anymore.
by Warhawks97
19 Oct 2020, 13:01
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor Doctrine suggestion.
Replies: 22
Views: 366

Re: Armor Doctrine suggestion.

I see and always saw both jumbos in armor doctrine. I mean why not? I would make it so that you unlock simply the jumbo and in game you can buy an upgrade that replaces the 75 mm with a 76 mm gun. So the next build jumbo comes out with a 76 gun and you wont be able to rebuild a 75 mm jumbo. So its a...
by Warhawks97
18 Oct 2020, 22:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
Replies: 11
Views: 328

Re: AB Airstrike CP Path

"The 82nd shouldnt have camo bc of cqb weapons" doesnt makes much sense to me. Commandoa, rangers, storms, SAS. All have powerfull weapons and lots of HP and can ambush. AB doesnt have any hard hitting gun, cheap tanks or big tanks or heavy defenses and shouldnt have. So having capable inf would jus...
by Warhawks97
18 Oct 2020, 16:45
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
Replies: 11
Views: 328

Re: AB Airstrike CP Path

so you want it to be fully indepemdent? I wouldnt do that. If anything put it after recon flight and it can still be 4 cp ion total. It shouldnt cost 4 CP as stand alone without getting anything prior to it. Its like paying 4 CP just for an standalone achilles or JP IV/70 or a single arty strike. It...
by Warhawks97
18 Oct 2020, 12:23
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
Replies: 11
Views: 328

Re: AB Airstrike CP Path

i would seperate after strafe. You always get the strafe which is basically vs soft but also armored targets. A Multirole strike if you will. From there you can go either bombs or rockets, depending on what you face more. Airstrikes should also cost always ammo and fuel in my opinion. AB could also ...