I understand that PE vehicles in the early game add variety to openings, which I'm all for. But I see where elpiojo is coming from, it is too punishing to lose to a vehicle opening based on RNG. If an AT gun misses, it's pretty much a guaranteed dominance for the PE early game. It doesn't make for a...

Oh right. Sorry I forgot to upload a module file also needed. I’ll post it when I get home

Yeah, i was working on that. I'll post it and you can test it. Only thing is it causes desyncs on some other game modes if others dont have the download. Didn't take the time to fix it or make any other balance adjustments. I can't upload SGAs here so i'll try to host it on a different place. here's...

I vehemetly disagree with most people on this thread, I think luft are ridiculously poorly designed in that they are too strong. There’s a goddamn reason why 90% of the pe players right now are playing luft. And you get full fucking games of two luft docs in a 2v2, sometimes 3 in larger games. But I...

IMO, US is much stronger than CW in a 1v1. But overall, Allies aren't designed to be good at 1v1's. Allies are designed to be specialized doctrines meaning they will always have some type of gaping whole in the overall composition in what it can deal with. It is not so much the firepower of their gu...

Devs have specifically mentioned no new changes are going into the upcoming patch and that will be their focus until release. Until then, I'm holding off on my own bitchfest on the luft doc and general artillery spamming.

Awwww yissss. Is this in the beta currently?

I'm 70% sure that calling in units from off map cause desyncs especially if it gets later in the game. It was always a gut feeling among players that this happens and I'm more or less confirming it in CoH2 which has the same problem. In my mod, I had it that all units aren't built but are called in,...

i mean the point of this post isn't to find a new way to retreat, but to find out why units can get suppressed while retreating.

Doable but abusable. Example:
Retreat to behind the mg emplacement.

I’m trying to figure out the “can’t retreat units surpressed” bug

WIP, found something new, need to correct. Can remove post for now

I'm pretty sure post ww2 the geneva convention was signed and in article 6 it specifically says: AT BOYs will not be represented in an unrealistic way in all future representations of the weapon. just saying, you could be committing a war crime.

Wowee calm down. It’s literally not the same ability as before. Adjustment details are in the original post by maker. Lol, really?? Oh, it cant insta immo anything above light armor, and? It makes all vehicles crap again. This squad is a fucking safari unit! A 7,92 mm rifle that hunts down any vehi...

Wowee calm down. It’s literally not the same ability as before. Adjustment details are in the original post by maker.

But it literally is easy to open worldbuilder and -2 players.

I was literally just going to post a correction that I realized as I was sitting on the toilet. The way that it could be done is to add an action for when an entity picks up the item, it adds the ability to the entity. You beat me to correcting my own shame and ignorance. Why don’t you love me. EDIT...

All the ebps have the treadbreaker ability, that's why the any closest unit will use the ability. Should only be the AT user that has it.

However there is two problems. bk Players seems not inclined to work and or take responsabilities. On the other side BK team story is one boss, and around that a few people who can possibly work but without decisional power. Anyway it is a long time bk team is limited to 1 ghost who is the continui...

We played the revised trun too, that desync'd almost immediately. But come to think of it, we played with the SAME players today successfully with even more players. So it does sound like a problem of one of the players maybe having an unlucky bad connection one day. IRL RNG hates us too apparently.

It's not map making, it's map labeling. simply putting "bk mod tip" on the name of the map is at the discretion of the devs. the only thing they asked for is to ask for permission from the original map makers in our proposal. in which case either: 1. those people are gone and are not reach...

I played a series of games with the same 3 other players, we had desyncs almost every game. I think we only completed 1 out of 5 attempted games without a desync. Sadly I can't really narrow down any reasons why. But, games not in beta were fine. For this reason, it was difficult to bug test anythin...

What you said was already done jails... and ? Devs said FY we dont want your 3v3 field of engagement maps ? yeeeeeep.... prettyyyy muchhhh..... they said "we like your idea and support it... but we are not going to make any changes to maps and want to players to set up the games themselves&quo...

What you said was already done jails... so we are resorting to whining cuz history on this forum shows that this works better than trying to be reasonable. Warhawks, i mean “5v5” maps aren’t “possible” but the point is large maps to accommodate that player amount is needed. For example, fields of en...

Jails, I understand wald’s frustration and the problem isn’t the existence of such maps but the acceptance of those maps in the community. I think he wants to point out to the devs that they put their “Bk mod tip” stamps on maps that contradict their own message. The devs say one thing, players refu...