Yeah, the regen for coming out of suppression is either altogether halted or heavily debuffed if the unit is still in combat. So you can essentially keep a unit pinned by firing pellets at a suppressed squad because the suppressed squad "stays in combat".

Question here is are there any situations where a call-in WOULD be good? For example, an idea that floated in my own head was that fireflies are removed from RAF but are turned into a call-in where it would call 2 fireflies for a really high price. The reason is it doesnt seem fair that RAF would ha...

I don't think anyone was necessarily crying... I hear sound arguments on both sides. Because I also believe it's true that USA Airborne doctrine is one of the most powerful doctrines because it's designed just like a typical axis doctrine. But, a big reason why it's a little more forgivable for airb...

In general, armored combat has gotten a bit gimmicky and something I think doctrine reworks will hopefully solve. I think the issue is that it's hard to balance armor doc vs blitz/terror doc where one side has tanks meant to be good all around while the otherside has tanks that have specific roles. ...

Sorry tiger, I don't think those are the scripts you were looking for. They're structured as if to define variables and settings, not necessarily why the game would behave a certain way or lead to a crash. The answer to the question was already provided by Markr, more simply it's an editable attribu...

A replay that better shows why I hate luft.

attachment=0]4p_le_paradis.2019-01-26.13-51-40.rec[/attachment]

I hope sgtsmith is okay that I posted this. He absolutely played really well and I made a lot of mistakes for sure. But still, I feel like a lot can be said about what went down this game

Hi everyone, Here is the first draft of the survey results I promised. I tried to take all the results and put them together. This is only a draft, I wanted to work on it more but I've gotten so busy in life that I thought I should just show you all now even if it's unfinished. This is just a balanc...

Yeah, allies have an equivalent in the RAF doctrine. Drop the tetrarch glider and you can build 76mm field guns. They dont have indirect fire though.

it fires itself like an AT gun but for infantry. ive gotten that fucker to ambush squad wipe many bastards.

That flakpanzer has to deploy to attack ground. When it’s not deployed it’s on AA mode.

Also the howitzer bug should be fixed next patch?

Could make the recon plane near invincible and never crash.

So one thing I was thinking is to make the ability like if a plane gets shot down it can never be used again. In SD44 you control the plane itself like it’s a unit. If it gets shot down you no longer have it And just cuz I know it might be asked, I don’t know how to make it that you’d have multiple ...

Grr that was my secret for a while. I was going to bring this up as point to general sniper reworks.

Even if possible I’d rather say keep the option to recrew than to not. There are still situations where you want to sacrifice a squad to recrew. I think it makes a game better if you have to make a hard decision rather than be unable to have any decision at all.

Only my opinion though

I was wondering it's probably possible to stop this exploit by adding a requirement to the bombard abilities that a player must be a particular doctrine to use. What do you think? In general i think unit limits aren't something worth including, units should be balanced so limits aren't an issue. It ...

AFAIK this is an oversight

This is where the line becomes difficult though, there is no criteria on who is a good player. There are no "professional players" because no one is being paid to play this game, otherwise it'd be easy to identify who to listen to. There is only "pro" in the slang term that means...

First of all, no amount of matches will provide objective results. Second of all, it doesn’t even matter what I think about luft because if the majority agree on something then it is more likely that the majority is right. Even if the majority is not right, it is how the game is evolved and the inte...

and who knows how to use luft? ... tell me There is not a single pro player who has played with luft and who has not been defeated by me in BK, from 1v1 to 4v4, even you ... especially if I play with doc inf or RA If you have crusader and rifleman with the British, you stop 70% of the Luft force, i...

Shanks wrote:

The New BK Champion wrote:Luft is strong not beacuse it's good itself, it's because somewhy people don't know how to counter it

it's totally true

My argument to this is: the reason luft is “counterable” is because players don’t know how to play luft

The post before plays pvp. I play pvp.
I have also sent out a mass survey among players who have experience and play. Survey shows luft is really strong.

Markr, what about just increasing the range of the throw and decreasing range of activation?

I know what you mean. I might be able to think of something but not sure if it’ll break the ability.

Hey man, glad to see another USA based player.
There are a few folks we can intro you to.
I’m Kwok on steam (the one with an elephant as a picture) in California in pacific time.
Walderschmidt, Mefisto, Shadowichigo are all on est