Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

So abuse of emplacements is not a problem right? See how a player spam AA or At emplacements it’s fine? So each game a RE player need 3or 4 At emplacements and an airborne player needs 4or 5 AA and still be able to spam more units right? As artillery abuse get penalized it should be nerf some how, e...

this whole situation have a name and it is EMPLACEMENT ABUSE.

I just watched the game. You played BK doc, so I have just one question - where was your StuH/StuPa? Their "long range" ability has enough range to snipe enemy emplacements from a distance where the emplacements cannot shoot back and this map had enough space to use them. You had Panthers/Tigers to...

If no penalties for campers then remove MU upkeep and let's go back to the artllery party games and every body happy.

ok, wait. This is a special case because one played RE doc. Its like demanding higher upkeep for shermans just because an armor doc player used lots of shermans. RE is all about holding out and then attack. Increase upkeep and your emplacments will be RE´s own grave. @Tiger: Pls upload:) so you are...

it was me playing RE doc on that game MEFISTO posted above, i also got it recorded.. still not exactly sure if will upload it or not though :P Actually, we were getting our a*s kicked until mid game.. even my emplacements were being wiped out quite easily, all until i got the "improvised emplacemen...

Well, emplacments have its strong sides on maps that are supporting them. But then again on different maps they arent that usefull. Also certain factions and doctrines rely heavily on it. Take RE as example. High Upkeep here might make it difficult to use them along with tanks. So i would be carefu...

There is no sense in putting limits on emplacements because your opponent can always use grenades/flamethrowers to kill his own emplacement crews, build new emplacements and then just re-crew the "empty" ones - this bypassing of emplacement limits is something we cannot prevent. increase mp upkeep ...

I am so tire of this crappy game stile, emplacement shoul cost a high mp upkeep so if you wanna camp it's fine but you wont be able spam units then.

Guys pls do something to this shit campimg game stile.

Since people are complaining about AB doc not being able to fight heavy tanks, how about removing the limit on the Hellcat? This should help AB doc, and at the same time there would be no need for jacksons. Also, it's not fine btw that AB strafe run has 100% chance to kill inf.. needs tweaking for ...

I am not agree to add sabotage to airborne doctrine, no WEHRMACHT doctrine have that ability only PE and CW and that is more than enough, about Jakson if you are thinking to add it, it shold be the camoufle version (the weakest) in case AA get buff, I don't think airborne is that weak I actually lik...

The only thing I wanna say is I like the camouflage, this can be a solution vs heavy units or vs campers. The doctrnes that don't have this units example PS they have their own strength (heavy inf heavy tanks and artillery ) also all doctrines have the units to spot camouflage enemies unit, I know c...

I am not agree to limit Aces to 1, let's make the game fun to play, not poor in game plays options.

I would like to add some things: 1- we need to get rid of Henschels,this sector even if its nerf still hit almost all allies vehicles on the field, if it get nerf abit more it is no going to be worthy, we need something like Allies AT air strike, I used to like the old Focke-Wulf Fw 190, may be we c...

I see and always saw both jumbos in armor doctrine. I mean why not? I would make it so that you unlock simply the jumbo and in game you can buy an upgrade that replaces the 75 mm with a 76 mm gun. So the next build jumbo comes out with a 76 gun and you wont be able to rebuild a 75 mm jumbo. So its ...

1- Pershing can mantain is CP cost, thats not the problem the US was never designed to have an easy to get heavy tank compared to panther. 2-You say that 2 shermans 75mm are better than a jumbo 75mm in a momment were axis dominate the medium tank phase with stugs and pzF, what would u do with both ...

1- Pershing should cost 7 cp ( now they come too late because we use cp in others line too; like to have artillery or make shermans cheaper) 2-Armor doctrine should have Jumbo 76 mm and cost 70 fuel, dont see a 75mm Jumbo in this doctrine because I can make (2) 75 shermans for cheaper and also use w...

Hey guys since the new patch came alive we have seen too many complaints about some doctrines, in effort to help our Devs to improve our favorite game I propose to make separate post (doctrines post) where we post what shold be change, why and a solution. Or how to make a doctrine a bit better, I th...

That is true, the problem is, as armor doctrine yuo can't go for pershings (same whith propaganda and tigers) as soon as you wish because you need artillery tank commander, cheaper sherman production, war machine etcetera... Everyone says how Shermans are not worth building, why do you need cheaper...

In my humble opinion to make this doctrine a bit better pershings should cost 7 cp, jumbo 76mm should be back to armor and cost 60fuel instead 80. so: 5cp a 76mm jumbo, 7cp persings 11 cp SP.

Same thing goes for pershings since you need 9 points to build them +2 for ace call in.I would argue that 4+1 points (same as terror's tigers) is more reasonable. 6cp for a 75 jumbo? to face what? 4 cp tigers? 6 cp panthers? ( + other people making similar CP comparisons ) People often think " to c...

I used to play amor Doctrine, now I feel it's so nerf that I don't like it, 6cp for a 75 jumbo? to face what? 4 cp tigers? 6 cp panthers? if you go for Jacksons ( easy to kill by StugIV) then pershings are going to be 15 cp so no reason to go pershings after pick Jacson because you need other part o...

i mean we listened to this: http://forum.bkmod.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=3767 I do not how made that post, also it's not a pipular one, no body even the post creator explain why the change or some options to pick, there was no debate about this change, I am agree to nerf the Hotchkiss or muve it to ...

Diablo wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020, 16:14

Not voting doesnt work. Otherwise you would have to weigh active players versus votes cast.. and i promise you, that way every vote would fail.
The community only sees votes, not non voters.

I will edit it when I get home, my bad, you are right, stay the same should be an option.