Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

i would be fine with 1 time only ACEs, but then they should be Vet4, and US Armor should be able to get both SP and Pershing ACE.. once for each.

Warhawks97 wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2020, 21:02

PS: Could you upload more PVP games throughout the next month?
I am currently unable to play myself bc i am not at home for over a month and need some entertainment.

Problem is i'm busy with university.. but i will try ^^
Glad you enjoy those vids

I can't stand the changes, because they're illogical and biased to start with. One has to ask those who enjoy the changes how often they play as allies in first place. You meant to specialize every doctrine and direct them toward skill-based play-styles, yet axis doctrines are not lacking in any as...

I don't think AB doc needs to have airstrikes earlier, they just need access to a proper tank.. if you think jackson would be too much.. well, at least give them the 76 Jumbo. I would be also for giving AB troops passive camo.. but not the 101st units.. only 82nd squads.

Actually, if anything the devs REALLY need to be credited for on this patch.. is the awesome work they had done on airstrikes for both sides. i think airstrikes are very balanced and work absolutely great right now... Henschels are 2 planes and they can kill stuff, so they are still useful but not O...

There are few things i hate about the new Bk Mod balance for sure, but i wouldn't say it's as much bad.. while 5.1.7 was definitely a balance gem (at least in my opinion) i still believe that 5.2.0 has created an interesting new approach to the game-play. Nevertheless, it's far from being balance at...

MarKr wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 15:48

52% penetration when the gun is touching the tank, 23% at max range (29% with camo bonus).

Do you have any replay with the issue that we can check?

Never-mind, i just went deep into this and made a test as well.. everything seems fine.

i think there is an error with penetration tables, the 37mm guns seem to have 100% pen chance against Pz3 at any range.. that's even better than 57mm guns! Can somebody plz re-check?

Cromwell relies on flank speed, and you can even kill Panthers that way.. so i don't think Cromwell needs any buffs in my opinion.

Also, if 95mm Cromwell ever comes back; it shouldn't have flank speed since it's an arty unit.

just briefly dropping my thoughts here as i'm short in time: Against buffing 101st squads, and flame nades shouldn't come back to 101st. in fact... i'm against buffing any Allied inf at all. Axis inf are now much weaker than they used to be in 5.1.7 already. i would even tweak SAS inf as they are cu...

it's possible to deploy Pz.3N from 3rd building, but then if you select the 2nd building, you will find Pz4.F1 has suddenly replaced the Pz3.N and when you click to deploy the Pz4, you will pay for 2 tanks.. Pz3 & Pz4 at the same time. So, basically Pz4.F1 and Pz3.N both share the same slot in SE do...

Glory!

YouTube just decided to shit on this video.. kept being available only in low quality (360p) for a long time; meh...

EDIT: never-mind, finally 1080p as of now.

Agreed on all points.

Yes, i'm absolutely sure no other weapons were shooting my Marder tank, and it was full HP when it was quickly killed by a US HMG squad at medium range in 1 burst.

Tiger comes defending himself, taking the "tiger and wurf" playstyle statement out of context and claiming he isn't playing like wurf at all. Yes, Tiger, you don't, I was talking only about the Tiger babysitting, which you do all the time, you cherish and play around with the super-duper tiger abil...

Also what's the difference between the option "SP should remain one time call in" and "no changes". I'd probably just assume add those votes together.... No, they are different options.. in his post, he clarified how he meant "shouldn't be 1 time call-in" so the SP would be available more than once.

Kwok, that's exactly how Tiger ACE is played right now, same as any heavy axis tanks. Look up a gameplay of players like tiger or wurf. Hmm, i really don't think my game-play is similar to Wurf's style in any possible way, shape or form.. like at all. Wurf also plays Axis 80% of the times, while i ...

i'm for ACE being available after SP is dead.

So, poll ended with this 10/3 result...
i didn't actually want to create a poll for such a suggestion, but i did it after kwok's hint.

Would be happy to see jagdpanther cheaper on the live release, along with the few other suggestions for Panzer Support mentioned in other topics.

i agree for removing crawling ability from snipers, so they should have only passive cover. Snipers could also have the "rapid firing" ability removed. Though, as mentioned before.. i'm not for adding sniper-shot ability for any unit. Neither do i support removing snipers from the game... And i woul...

i think the SturmPios are essential for any PE doc, as a standard unit.

Voted the 4th option, but just to clarify something.. all "engineer" units would be able to repair in 2 seconds, so... SturmPios and RE sappers as well.
in addition to AB Engineers.. etc! You don't need to edit the Poll, but i just had to clarify that.

Actually, there's a hidden trick to the way you use field craft to detect mines. You got to queue up a lot of attack orders with the shift command in order to make them stop at regular intervals to spot mines around them. This is better explained here with a video attached at the bottom: https://ww...

i'm against adding sniper ability for PzGrens, however.. i wouldn't mind 1 sniper unit in Panzer Support doctrine.