Search found 3833 matches

by Tiger1996
13 Apr 2019, 23:56
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

While i support reworking the off-map support to provide only Pz3s, yet... I have to point out that removal of Stug4 tanks from Blitz doc, is going to be a hard hit for the AT capabilities, since that Stug4 is the only available "tank hunter" option.. and without it, there is no any TDs in...
by Tiger1996
12 Apr 2019, 22:40
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: US Healing cost
Replies: 9
Views: 195

Re: US Healing cost

Tigahfluenza is spreading incredibly fast i'm giving it a pass.. although it can be funnier. ============================== Oh, and the reason I don't visit this place as much as I used to do in the past.. is because it's just too rotten, almost a dishonor to stay. Though; I still have my glasses.....
by Tiger1996
10 Apr 2019, 02:45
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

Ya, I think Viper keeps bringing the best ideas here. I also agree that off-map support would no longer provide any Pz4 or Stugs, but only Pz3.M if it's added. At this point tough, the off-map support could remain available only after 3 Command Points, as there would be no need to delay it! However,...
by Tiger1996
07 Apr 2019, 23:35
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

It was my idea to have the call in early at 2CP and P4 to be 4CP. Ah, no wonder then... :P I already recognized it might be one of your oblivion ideas :lol: Felt like something similar to the Luft doc suggestions you made few months ago, not surprise :D The original reason was with the new command ...
by Tiger1996
07 Apr 2019, 23:00
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

Terror would have Nebels, Def would have its various ways of artillery, Blitz doc would have the LeiG.18 and it's definitely different from a mortar! LeiG.18 has much higher range and in fact quite powerful shells (ever since they were buffed in a recent patch) so the LeiG.18 would perfectly fit. Mo...
by Tiger1996
07 Apr 2019, 20:50
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

About booby traps In my opinion I’m inclined to say no to booby traps as the doctrine is originally designed to reward aggression and booby traps doesn’t quite fit that bill. If anything it belongs in defensive doctrine (but that doesn’t mean it will make an appearance there). It isn’t that necessa...
by Tiger1996
06 Apr 2019, 13:05
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

- About booby traps, well ya.. it might not be very suitable in Blitz doc after all, as it would make more sense in Terror or Def, but i just had to remind everyone that WH faction has no booby traps at all, so it could be an option! For the Blitz doc, smoke screen might be more viable then. - About...
by Tiger1996
05 Apr 2019, 10:05
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)
Replies: 100
Views: 3276

Re: 5.1.8 beta (Blitzkrieg doctrine rework)

Alright, so... I have finally got the chance to get a closer look at this. it's no secret that Blitz doc is my most played doctrine in the game, alongside US Armor and then US Airborne... So, I suppose my feedback could be useful.. or at least that's what I hope. First of all, I was expecting the do...
by Tiger1996
29 Mar 2019, 14:00
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!
Replies: 31
Views: 10307

Re: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!

Yes, but what Pblitz meant was that most people don't have this problem and only a few do. If there was a problem within the game files everyone would experience this. That suggests that the issue is coming from the side of the users that experience the problem. it's true that not everyone is exper...
by Tiger1996
27 Mar 2019, 10:42
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!
Replies: 31
Views: 10307

Re: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!

Yup, that confused me the first time when I saw it, as well.. it's a valid observation. However, i think it's nothing more than edited picture, and not actual saved settings. His point is.. those options can be tweaked as much as you like if available, based on your PC capabilities.
by Tiger1996
27 Mar 2019, 10:15
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!
Replies: 31
Views: 10307

Re: [FAQ] Common Problems, read before posting!

in order to enable Ultra terrain, you will first need to set "Shader Quality" at Ultra. And that's not recommended because it would eventually force CoH to use Dx10 which is not very well optimized with this old game engine.. the same way with A-A settings, you gotta keep it at x4 maximum,...
by Tiger1996
24 Mar 2019, 23:12
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.7 live release
Replies: 39
Views: 1882

Re: 5.1.7 live release

why does it still say 516 on steam? I think that's why... Critical glitch in version 5.1.7 (live branch): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8jPSukHBVk Video is unlisted . Not sure what is exactly doing this immense damage against JPz L/70 and half-tracks or armored cars.. but I think it might be the...
by Tiger1996
24 Mar 2019, 19:05
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Sherman bug
Replies: 5
Views: 146

Re: Sherman bug

9th Armored Division wrote:How to fix Sherman bug with purple arrow help

Are you "Tom Cat" who posted this comment on my channel?

Untitled.png


If yes, I told you to update your graphics driver.. so, have you already tried that?
by Tiger1996
23 Mar 2019, 00:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: panthers
Replies: 10
Views: 274

Re: panthers

Viper wrote:i think panther.g should be slightly cheaper from 890 mp to 800 mp. does not make much different anyway.

Given the fact that Terror doc Tiger tank currently costs 840 MP then I would lower the Panther-G price to 839 MP and this way the principle would also remain unbroken! XD
by Tiger1996
21 Mar 2019, 20:33
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 105 howitzers
Replies: 31
Views: 814

Re: 105 howitzers

I am for the "only arty doctrines can use barrages on captured static howitzers". The thing is that static howitzers (and barrages from them) are an asset which is meant to be dontrine-specific but due to the capture system of the game, it possible to get this thing even as another doctri...
by Tiger1996
21 Mar 2019, 16:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 105 howitzers
Replies: 31
Views: 814

Re: 105 howitzers

4 seconds are perhaps too much, but increasing it is also not an option, or not by too much. Else all units can just run away after the first shell hit the area Artillery isn't supposed to hunt down mobile targets anyway... They are meant to strike static defense, so.. in my opinion; this would be ...
by Tiger1996
21 Mar 2019, 08:48
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 105 howitzers
Replies: 31
Views: 814

Re: 105 howitzers

But what’s the solution It's fine that howitzers have the longest range.. and the fact that they can't move is already compensated by this, in addition to being very cheap. Now, the biggest problem is; - insane rate of fire, 4 seconds?? Reloading faster than 2 pdr guns... Really? - Number of shells...
by Tiger1996
21 Mar 2019, 02:34
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 105 howitzers
Replies: 31
Views: 814

Re: 105 howitzers

I would like to bump this topic once again... Let alone the fact that players can exploit the limit of only 2 howitzers by burning the crew and then building more howitzers for themselves and their team-mates too... I dare to say that currently, these howitzers are the ULTIMATE weapon in the game, t...
by Tiger1996
14 Mar 2019, 21:11
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle
Replies: 33
Views: 904

Re: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle

The ability at Storms is not there to equip them with Schrecks, crawl to enemy tanks and blow them up. You don't really need that tactics in a doctrine which has access to PIV H/J, Panthers and Tigers. Well, this one part is true.. though; i'm not sure if it would remain to be so. Given that doctri...
by Tiger1996
14 Mar 2019, 17:00
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle
Replies: 33
Views: 904

Re: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle

Viper wrote:and i want to add.......why is 517 not released yet? :mrgreen:

kwok wrote:This is also why 5.17 is not released.

it's released.
by Tiger1996
14 Mar 2019, 13:22
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle
Replies: 33
Views: 904

Re: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle

You compare Stormtroopers to different types of infantry, both are infantry, both can crawl and both can obtain handheld AT + you top it off with "both are elite and have muscles" so it sounds solid. Where it starts falling appart are the points where they are NOT similar - specifically t...
by Tiger1996
14 Mar 2019, 03:59
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle
Replies: 33
Views: 904

Re: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle

I am not against changing the unit but I would like to keep the unit in some way special, so not turn it into "BOYS squad in Wehrmacht uniform". I would be for lowering the HP and possibly also the number of the soldiers, limiting mobility in some way, lowering accuracy (possibly connect ...
by Tiger1996
13 Mar 2019, 04:33
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle
Replies: 33
Views: 904

Re: Vehicle Extinction and AT Rifle

Honestly, I don't have much problems with this WH AT rifle squad.. and the 65 basic range is justified as it can't ambush... Generally, I really can't imagine playing WH without this unit, specifically after the 50.cal buff which makes most Allied vehicles a lot more deadly than they used to be. Tho...
by Tiger1996
26 Feb 2019, 20:18
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.7patch
Replies: 58
Views: 3450

Re: 5.1.7patch

Statement of Policy: The Tiger should be balanced by changing its CP instead of its price. That's 1 thing I totally support Hawks with.. we are talking about a tank that participated in the war since 1942 in comparison to the Pershing on the other hand which has participated only for a few months a...
by Tiger1996
21 Feb 2019, 22:00
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 5.1.7patch
Replies: 58
Views: 3450

Re: 5.1.7patch

There's no reason a 76mm sherman should ever bounce this 50mm front plate. No reason a 20mm flak gun in the base should frontally penetrate and kill the comet (even stuart has less chance of being penetrated by the 20mm flak gun than the cromwells armor); it's just all sorts of wrong. Realistically...

Go to advanced search