Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

My point was rather to discuss the way you have to use the glider now + its loadout. It is absolutely not wondrous people "abused" the glider in the way it has been done: Because the use of landing the glider with range zero commandos in hinterland is just waaay to bad for the price in ear...

- Added green flare to indicate landing area of all Gliders - Gliders will arrive 5 seconds after the flare falls This is actually a quite massive nerf to the RAF doctrine. Almost every CW air player will have a hard time adapting to this change because it was a key factor especially in early game ...

Do you guys think any balancing issues would occur if you make the 6-pounder available in the Infantry Truck? Honestly I don't think so ... I still don't see the reason why it is just such a massive problem for you to implement that ... It wouldn't harm the balancing at all, not on your life, but f...

Today all for 107, rangers spam and off map arty. I think this sentence captures the inf doc playstyle these days of many players quite accurately Like you said, 107 mortars exist for a long time actually but have never been used as extensive as now in my view. They are "trendy" right now...

Also, the answer to your why is that i bring this up because i am baffled to such an expensive unit being quite useless. So i want to bring to to the attention to the devs with the help of the community, which i thabk you all once again. It was not really meant as a statement against your thread bu...

Nope, it is intended, CW has to use AT boys, Piats or any of the vehicles early. It can be ridiculous to handle Piats on open maps, it would have been cool to decide between Piats and 6-pounder in the infantry truck as every other faction is also able to decide between Infantry AT or pak-AT ... I s...

A little question regarding CW's 6-pounder: why can it not be built in the Infantry Truck and only in the Glider via Lieutenant?? Isn't that a weird balancing somehow? It is not the case that Boys AT are reliable (maybe that changes after the patch) so CW is in need to field 6-pounder frequently but...

Warhawks97 wrote:Check that maybe, last page(s):
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=629&view=unread#unread

Yeah saw it after the post! Finally we might see Boys AT doing their job right!!

And before talking about moving him we should talk about Boys AT performance in generell^^ Haha thats right So many years past by, so many jokes and memes have been made about Boys AT but still not a single buff. I already abandoned all hope concerning that topic ... With the lieutenant bonus+sprin...

Yeah says it all. Kinda sad that this fix never happened in recent years Commando Boys AT is one of the most useless units in BK ...

If you don't wanna fix the MP cost or the weapon layout which is problematic, please ensure at least that the zooka accuracy will be increased. Btw. why is there even a discussion going on about if the SAS squad is really weak?? I mean even a BK beginner instantly notices that they underperform, esp...

I was just talking to Belisar and he discussed with VFA a weird thing about axis weapons in allied hands and vice versa. It seems that allied weapons receive a buff when in axis hands and axis weapons getting nerfed when in allied hands. The issue is nearly verified for paks and schrecks. I am just ...

... Yeah that sums it up nicely! SAS are weak as f*ck btw. for the price but it is quite common knowledge kinda Any reasonable RAF player won't even get em. Only DEV's seem to ignore that one. Commandos with stens also could be better. It kinda sucks you have to invest 8 (!!!) CP's in them to make ...

Thank you. Sad to hear that.

I am not in the mood for reading all the stuff; can someone, maybe even a DEV, summarize what the current attitude is? The discussion should have made clear that it is more than a serious problem ...

What I was asking on the other hand actually is to slightly increase the price of the Typhoon bombing run airstrike ^^ In the past DEV's actually decreased the prices because planes tend to fail really often now. I think thats totally fair like it is implemented. Did you ever play RAF and see yours...

First of all thank you for bringing up that issue again. Would be fan of it. The RAF arty thing is old as hell but DEV's seem to ignore CW players on this one pretty much for a long time. Since almost every axis doc has some neblers or wurfrahmens or stuff it would just be fair. Axis Luftwaffe also ...

One thing is clear: Wolf will definitely not get around reconsidering the detection levels. Delaying the crawling ability is clearly something a hypocrite would do just to quickly calm the allied players down and basically giving the axis the same advantage as before. It would be a pseudo fix becaus...

So u r denying BOTH the solutions of delaying the ability with 4 CPs and also the other super dumb one of delaying it plus also increasing its detection rate... You are right. What is left is the solution of increasing the detection rate alone! Storms won't be delayed by 4 CP, only the crawling abi...

Delaying the crawling of the Stormtroopers with 4 CP's seems insincere to me. Like slowing the death of a patient without even trying to medicate him ... Delaying the Storms plus increasing the detection level should not be an option. I think the time the Stormtroopers appear on the battlefield is t...

I am not always sure about balancing suggestions, but with this one I am. Something has to be done. Currently the Stormtroopers are neither realistic nor fair. I had countless debates on this issue with various players and most of the time the conclusion was to simply increase the detection of a cra...