Search found 2226 matches

by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 13:37
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

@MarKr But did anyone complain about the price of IVJ being worthless? Like I said, in my opinion the IVJ can't be cheaper than OstWind. And even this wouldn't make it any worthless: - Before mass production: IVH = 550 MP / 80 F IVJ = 500 MP / 60 F - After mass production: IVH = 450 MP / 55 F IVJ =...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 13:17
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Medic Truck wrote:@Warhawks,

Where are the changes preview for Armor doc? I can see your thread of suggestion only.


scroll up. First post from markr ;)
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:59
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

That new armor doc sounds and looks nice. Not sure if it was in this forum or the old one. But we had that idea with ammo supply for armor doc already. I am glad to see it at the end after like more than three years when such an idea was brought up for the first time. Veery cool. Also that war machi...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:29
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

When i talked about mobility or flexibility i didnt talk about comparing top speed of sherman vs tank IV. And the e8 was as fast as a Panther. Its about vehicle, production speed, replacment speed and mechanized tools that work together. As for the US in general they got famous as being the most mob...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:08
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement
Replies: 4
Views: 66

Re: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement

Makes sense. I didnt play def doc really. And i dont have the full tectree pic in mind. But sure that the 75 mm emplacment comes with Pantherturm? Isnt there this unlock in the second column bottom? Or is that just making emplacment stronger. But generally yes it makes sense. Maybe take a look at ot...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 00:45
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Maybe the J is not getting cheap enough but the H too cheap? H is from 80 fuel to 55. Thats more than 20 fuel less. Just as comparision. The 76 sherman is reduced by 95 MP and 10 fuel if i am right. The e8 135 MP and 15 fuel. And the Axis td do also not lose that much. The IV/70 goes from 580 to 525...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 20:51
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

@Markr. Maybe i made a mistake. But corsix clearly says that J has tp skirts. I know you changed it but somehow its like it was before. Also Tiger is right. You would have to calculate it down from 550/70 . Not sure but doesnt Tank IV H needs 5 CP to get that cheap while J is unlocked after faster p...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 20:40
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Thing is that the left line is supposed to be the tree which contains all the special or modified sherman versions for specific roles. And nobody would choose a battlegroup of rather standard units over that special armored sherman version. Whats the point of the Pershing ace? Sure, bit different st...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 17:21
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

What are we going to fill the void of infantry doctrine 105 sherman unlock? Feel free with ideas. There would be many ideas if a few people would think about it for a short time. Vet training for rangers (so they spawn vet 1) would be one of my first thoughts. VT could have one in exchange for a sl...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 17:08
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 27
Views: 417

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Ok. I knew that jeep moves to inf doc. But what is that doc now? It seems like "everything we have no use for or dont want in other docs will be moved to inf doc" What inf doc has now? Howitzer with VT light mobile howitzers very mobile rocket arty Two off map arty strikes (Elite) infiltra...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 12:01
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

@Tiger: 1.Its just Pershing. No SP or ace. Both removed. 2. The CP OK, here you go...you did not mention CP requirements for individual unlocks so before anyone starts to point at required point:THE CP REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT CHANGED IN THIS MONTAGE! Sure Teller wont cost 2 CP´s alone, or Pershing 4 CP...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 02:03
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

@Illa: That battlegroup would not be random stuff. As i said it has to be more clearly defined. It should not be like the BK one (which is often used actually besides being random). Just i let it open for suggestions. And there can be two, one for mid game some sort of light version and one for late...
by Warhawks97
24 Jul 2017, 23:24
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Thx a lot Markr. Thx sooo much.

Yeah CP idk. Its left open. Important was the design at first.
by Warhawks97
24 Jul 2017, 21:51
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Hello everyone. Got back home and having some time for suggesting. Thing is i am almost in desperate need for Markrs Help now. Hope he will do. So here comes a suggestion of how the new Armor doc could look like: Upper left corner to lower left Corner. The special purpose Sherman Branch: (Allied_arm...
by Warhawks97
24 Jul 2017, 11:15
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Good example of Armor doc
Replies: 17
Views: 287

Re: Good example of Armor doc

That game shows that the doc is a idle, passive and everything but a "forward going doc". You wait there like a police officer waiting for reason to get active. And this is when either inf comes in (shermam) or tanks (SP). That's it. And in both scenarios all other allied docs could offer ...
by Warhawks97
24 Jul 2017, 11:03
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 27
Views: 446

Re: Armor doctrine

What we could do: 1. That ability cost to 200 if not 175. 2. Replaces only shermans, vehicles and m10/18. Nothing else 3. Replacing at least 5 units. If not more. But no Jackson or jumbo etc. 4. Put together with global repair. Both abilities are rarely used due to cost and bad efficiency. Global re...
by Warhawks97
23 Jul 2017, 23:55
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 27
Views: 446

Re: Armor doctrine

Allied Warmachine, the doctrine unlock gives you an ability which you can activate and all tanks lost during the active time will be replaced instantly by spawning new tanks of the same type from offmap as reinforcements. So in theory if you do a tank assault with 7 Shermans, 2 M10 and a Pershing a...
by Warhawks97
23 Jul 2017, 23:23
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Good example of Armor doc
Replies: 17
Views: 287

Re: Good example of Armor doc

I am not at home so I make it short. 1. You don't lack ammo coz you play armor doc pretty much "pershing only". Try anything else and you will lack ammo. Simply you need it to kill any paper tank. SP again makes you saving ammo. 2. I didn't say comet is too cheap or achilles. CW is all abo...
by Warhawks97
21 Jul 2017, 22:20
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Good example of Armor doc
Replies: 17
Views: 287

Re: Good example of Armor doc

Min 33:13 That kind of unlock. A doc reduced to one unit. Thats what i am talking about. Thats what i was talking about: However, due to the current US faction and doctrine design playing US feels a lot more like playing a "fake fiction". Rangers as basic units to stand a chance vs standar...
by Warhawks97
21 Jul 2017, 14:51
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 27
Views: 446

Re: Armor doctrine

The E8 has 0.82 received penetration modifier while the 76 has 0.85. Thus e8 armor is better. Tigers pen both easily but aganinst 75 mm L/48 and 50 mm guns that can have an impact in the results. E8 is faster (As fast as Panther or Jagdpanther.. Has higher accuracy while moving and idk if it has mor...
by Warhawks97
21 Jul 2017, 01:05
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Like I said earlier, I am OK with reducing the range of rocket artillery as proposed... Even though I honestly don't really consider it a big deal anyhow. But then the Sherman 105 range has to be significantly reduced as well.. and the RA doc 75mm half-track too, 175 range is way too much. Keeping ...
by Warhawks97
20 Jul 2017, 20:25
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Well, its a usability thing. Too little range would mean its useless because it can get countered easily and its not mobile like the maultier or walking stuka. However, i dont think there is an easy fix for this. More realism would mean half range compared to the lFh18, but that is sooo shortrange ...
by Warhawks97
20 Jul 2017, 13:22
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

In all i must have approx 3000 hours spend in BK and pvp (started long before coh went to steam). That means exactly what? To your second part. Sure the those who use arty smart wins, not those who use most. That doesnt change the annoyance. Also, yes i/we can. But only when using a specific artille...
by Warhawks97
19 Jul 2017, 21:40
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Thats interesting. Isnt it the case that many hate it when all their tanks get all the time wrecked by the rocket arty? And now it shall be only a threat exactly to them. the concept of (these ww2) rocket arty is actually area bombardmend so far. Wouldnt like it actually to see being kind of an accu...
by Warhawks97
19 Jul 2017, 19:51
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Adding more arty in terms of quantity? A big no from me. I think having more arty available wouldn't make the game more strategical than having long range arty. More? Where? Now that balance is pretty good ( except for the very next moments after a bad game, and this seems to me the reason why bala...

Go to advanced search