Search found 2242 matches

by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 14:14
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Ok. Have you gusy read about the accleration thing which i consider as the main reason for that quick forth and reverse. 4.2 for shermans (and croc), 4.6 for e8, 3.5 for jumbos, 3.8 for calli. Boost accleration for them and its fine here. Panther to max 4.4 (or 4.2), fix acceleration for the cats (n...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 14:02
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Glad to hear Warhawks. The 57 usually one hit kills light vehicles since it has more dmg than 50mm and axis usually have lower hp values than US halftracks. The M16, the axis 251 and 251 with 37 mm have 315 HP. So think they are all equal so far. damage is 50-90 for US and 50 to 80 for axis. No rea...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 13:17
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

I didnt talk about the 3 vs 3. That was a failed game anyways. yeah, i had two 2 vs 2. One i had with tiger Luft /BK combo that worked. And yeah, the other was with you SE and Luft.
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 13:00
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

- Axis 37mm and 50mm PaKs should now one-shot Dingo and Bren Carrier I know i've been pointed out as Brits biased, that's probably why i'm the only one not completely agreeing on this one :) . I agree with 50mm pak oneshotting Dingo and Bren carrier, tho i'm not really sure about the 37mm AT: Only ...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 12:41
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

No 38km/h isn't accurate at all! http://www.wwiivehicles.com/united-states/vehicle/medium-tank/m4-medium-tank.asp It is. The M4 had many different engines giving it speeds from 38 to 42. 105 had 40 approx For the game they can be upped to 4.0 easily. The M4A1 series was the worst so far with 38-39 ...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 01:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Funny. Last post there was from me.... Making one more as i am more objective on it now. Better now? I dont want any further escalation. But you bashing against mid game issues while your problem is elsewhere. Not even in US but CW. Haven't read a single thing. BUT I think we can move this topic som...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 01:09
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: General discussion on the recent balance
Replies: 37
Views: 1110

Re: General discussion on the recent balance

Yes, i do make a new post to have this topic marked as unread for others. Due to latest experience: 1. They received the earliest AT in game - also most mobile and unflankable one. That makes any vehicles useless. The clou of using armored units in (early) game is to flank thanks to speed and to use...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 00:44
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Well. I think we could have got you if the Luft Panther didnt came on the right. Coz later you struggled when we were just about to bolster our lines. Yes we had two noobs in our team. But as i said: Ive seen very well how old tactics work still in like 20 games. Rocket arty spam, Tank IV/ Gebirgs....
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 00:38
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

My dear friend, u know why we played swimming in res and suiciding every second unit? Not because axis are good, but because teams were unbalanced. We didn't really have to care to win. What I am concerned about are balanced games where axis have no start to allies. But I guess that 1 lost game is ...
by Warhawks97
27 Jul 2017, 00:09
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

I will tell you who you played with. You played with me under different names. With me and my mates, when you lost as allies vs axis. And I saw what you are doing. You are playing using old style, style that doesn't work - then you come here and agitate to change the mod to fit your vision of the m...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 23:46
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

How many games have you played with current patch? 13 win streak with axis (first game was a loss iirc). 5 losses to 1 win with US (wasnt that one against you? me and shadow and kwok. You said something or complaint which pissed kwok so he left. Complaining about using a certain unit or something. ...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 22:24
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Re: Anti tank gun and veterancy.

Can you pls stop hating arround? What happend with you? In my memories you are actually a friendly guy. And suddenly this? Its not that i make decisions here. I mean i made my private mod anyway with 400 or more changes. Do you see me suggesting 400 changes now? I did play games lately. Sometimes wi...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 21:48
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 31
Views: 482

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

I stopped reading at: ''SP removed'' SP is the whole purpose of existence of the armor doc! The alpha and omega! Sad enough. This is the whole story actually. An entire doctrine reduced to a single unit. Can you imagine, there was a time before SP came as a Beta unit in 4.7. So you rush straight fo...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 21:42
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Anti tank gun and veterancy.
Replies: 21
Views: 235

Anti tank gun and veterancy.

How to start. I think simply throwing stuff arround. So here we go. Axis and CW AT guns (checked the 6 pounder, 17, 50 mm and 75 mm) Veterancy Bonuses: Vet 1: 0.85 received damage modifier Vet 2: 1.15 increased health modifier Vet 3: 1.155 weapon damage modifier US 57 and 76 mm AT guns Veterancy Bon...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 20:14
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement
Replies: 11
Views: 155

Re: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement

If you want to mess up def doc I'd like a crack at it as well. Some things never sat well with me but Xali did what he thought was best. Markr, are you on discord sometime? I have a few ideas to make def doc work a little better / differently. Seeing how i was the only betatester who played that do...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 19:58
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

With that speed thing i think Kwok made a good point with that cartoon thing.To unify them makes sense for sure. But we could start a debate about armor in general again at this point. Is it hilarous that tank go forth and back like a ferrari? Yes. And that might gonna happen. At the same time is it...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 13:37
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

@MarKr But did anyone complain about the price of IVJ being worthless? Like I said, in my opinion the IVJ can't be cheaper than OstWind. And even this wouldn't make it any worthless: - Before mass production: IVH = 550 MP / 80 F IVJ = 500 MP / 60 F - After mass production: IVH = 450 MP / 55 F IVJ =...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 13:17
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Medic Truck wrote:@Warhawks,

Where are the changes preview for Armor doc? I can see your thread of suggestion only.


scroll up. First post from markr ;)
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:59
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

That new armor doc sounds and looks nice. Not sure if it was in this forum or the old one. But we had that idea with ammo supply for armor doc already. I am glad to see it at the end after like more than three years when such an idea was brought up for the first time. Veery cool. Also that war machi...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:29
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 31
Views: 482

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

When i talked about mobility or flexibility i didnt talk about comparing top speed of sherman vs tank IV. And the e8 was as fast as a Panther. Its about vehicle, production speed, replacment speed and mechanized tools that work together. As for the US in general they got famous as being the most mob...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 12:08
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement
Replies: 11
Views: 155

Re: Replacing 75mm emplacement with 88mm emplacement

Makes sense. I didnt play def doc really. And i dont have the full tectree pic in mind. But sure that the 75 mm emplacment comes with Pantherturm? Isnt there this unlock in the second column bottom? Or is that just making emplacment stronger. But generally yes it makes sense. Maybe take a look at ot...
by Warhawks97
26 Jul 2017, 00:45
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

Maybe the J is not getting cheap enough but the H too cheap? H is from 80 fuel to 55. Thats more than 20 fuel less. Just as comparision. The 76 sherman is reduced by 95 MP and 10 fuel if i am right. The e8 135 MP and 15 fuel. And the Axis td do also not lose that much. The IV/70 goes from 580 to 525...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 20:51
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 65
Views: 1148

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

@Markr. Maybe i made a mistake. But corsix clearly says that J has tp skirts. I know you changed it but somehow its like it was before. Also Tiger is right. You would have to calculate it down from 550/70 . Not sure but doesnt Tank IV H needs 5 CP to get that cheap while J is unlocked after faster p...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 20:40
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 31
Views: 482

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Thing is that the left line is supposed to be the tree which contains all the special or modified sherman versions for specific roles. And nobody would choose a battlegroup of rather standard units over that special armored sherman version. Whats the point of the Pershing ace? Sure, bit different st...
by Warhawks97
25 Jul 2017, 17:21
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 31
Views: 482

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

What are we going to fill the void of infantry doctrine 105 sherman unlock? Feel free with ideas. There would be many ideas if a few people would think about it for a short time. Vet training for rangers (so they spawn vet 1) would be one of my first thoughts. VT could have one in exchange for a sl...

Go to advanced search