Search found 1781 matches

by MarKr
26 Sep 2018, 00:16
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: FORCE RETREAT
Replies: 5
Views: 175

Re: FORCE RETREAT

To by honest, I don't think this can be fixed, due to how the ability works in the engine. In the doctrinal rework, Force Retreat (including those two abilities in Terror doc) is changed to something completely different.
by MarKr
25 Sep 2018, 11:41
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Misleading fire cone preview for .50 cal emplacement
Replies: 1
Views: 73

Re: Misleading fire cone preview for .50 cal emplacement

yeah, it is sort of messed up for all MG nests...the "fire cone preview" is a bit off compared to the actual MG cone of fire when the the nest is built. but I haven't found a way to fix it the only thing I managed to do sofar was to "bypass" it on Axis MG nests by making the &quo...
by MarKr
25 Sep 2018, 09:44
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: some questions
Replies: 15
Views: 249

Re: some questions

In that quote isn't really much of an idea, but rather explaining problems with adding more soldiers to the squad when the commander has been built already :D
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 23:52
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [StG44] Fresh look on the gun
Replies: 14
Views: 192

Re: [StG44] Fresh look on the gun

That is a difference in weapon settings - Garands shoot single shots and between each of them is "cooldown" - cooldown can be set differently based on range. SMGs and in general any burst-weapon work the way that they shoot a burst and there is a cooldown between bursts. You can set how ma...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 23:46
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: some questions
Replies: 15
Views: 249

Re: some questions

Or Perhaps inf doc one would have a special captain. That way we wouldnt need to increase the cost so much since its a cruical unit for US gameplay. Perhaps with ranger Truck unlock the ranger captain would automatically get a 3 men squad? Inf doc is the doc that could use a better frontline captai...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 23:31
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [StG44] Fresh look on the gun
Replies: 14
Views: 192

Re: [StG44] Fresh look on the gun

This feels like one of those "let's change something that works in the game just fine, only to make it work a little bit different with very little practical impact" topics... Is there really any problem with StG efficiency? It doesn't seem so, on contrary, it is considered one of the best...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 20:27
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: some questions
Replies: 15
Views: 249

Re: some questions

first-Could they have an escort? the US-British captains and the WM officer? They could, though I am not sure what you mean in case of CW - they have Lieutenants (bonuses for offense) and Captain (bonuses for defense). You speak about "British Captains" but they provide bonuses only to so...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 13:37
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: some questions
Replies: 15
Views: 249

Re: some questions

I know, right? Outrageous! How dare they not to answer every single topic created on this forum!

Wolf is a statue, MarKr tries to steal the mod!
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 11:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

It is not about the time spent on it, really, if had a problem with investing my time into modding the game I wouldn't have started with it in the first place. I just reacted to the part of your post which said that "changing it would be easier than keeping it the way it is" - which didn't...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 10:28
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

I wonder if you read it entirely. Tanks with top mounted would get some drawbacks since they wont be able to engage Tanks/vehicles and flanking infantry at the same time since aiming the gun on a tank would make it impossible to fire it at infantry coming from the sides. It would also make it much ...
by MarKr
24 Sep 2018, 06:09
Forum: Bugs
Topic: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged
Replies: 10
Views: 109

Re: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged

- Anti-infantry mines get triggered by everything but can only damage infantry and non-armored vehicles (Schwims, Jeeps etc.) - Multi-purpose mines (Greyhound has them) can also be triggered by everything. They are more deadly vs infantry than the first type, can deal good damage to vehicles and me...
by MarKr
23 Sep 2018, 23:50
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

I didnt say buff. ... The Coax and Top mounted have together approx the same damage output (at some distances perhaps slightly more) as the current top mounts have currently. ... Obviously not much. If the final effect is pretty much "(almost) nothing has changed" then why bother with it ...
by MarKr
23 Sep 2018, 20:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

Yes, I know you wanted buffs for coaxial and hull MGs several times and I heard you but it is also about you not hearing me. There is this simple question: Why do you want to make those changes? Your answer was usually "because the MGs do nothing and it is ridiculous because in reality those MG...
by MarKr
23 Sep 2018, 08:44
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

The 75 mm Halftracks have a coaxial MG mounted next to the gun with very little or non effect like coaxial MG´s. The same weapon is mounted on the Puma version with that stubby 75 mm (reward for the 50 mm) just using top mounted MG42 stats. Thus both vehicles cost about the same (350 MP or so) just...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 20:15
Forum: Bugs
Topic: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged
Replies: 10
Views: 109

Re: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged

OK, it is just a describtion error. As I said above, true AT mines which can only be triggered by vehicles are available to Armor doctrine and can only be placed by normal Engineers. 20180922211038_1.jpg Green is the "Anti-infantry" mine Orange is the "Multi-purpose" mine Red is ...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 17:37
Forum: Bugs
Topic: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged
Replies: 10
Views: 109

Re: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged

If u place them with greyhound, yes they will be triggered with inf. Greyhound does not have these AT mines. Some time ago we classified mines into 3 types - anti-infantry, multi-purpose and AT mines. - Anti-infantry mines get triggered by everything but can only damage infantry and non-armored veh...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 17:29
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem
Replies: 22
Views: 417

Re: Defensive Doctrine vehicles cost efficiency problem

Flakpanzer 38(t) Gepard: 320 mp / 30 fuel Armor is sort of "meh", gun quite good but because of mobility and lack of rotating turret you don't get to use it that often, no abilities...it seems to me as one more example of unit which "is there just to have more units". Def Doctri...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 16:02
Forum: Bugs
Topic: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged
Replies: 10
Views: 109

Re: American M1A1 AT mine is bugged

Are you 100% sure? I checked the settings and triggering is set the same way as other AT mines in the game. Is it possible that perhaps some unit revealed the mine and the soldiers opened fire at it and thus detonated it? It can happen and if they are close enough, they get caught in the explosion. ...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 13:23
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5
Replies: 79
Views: 3204

Re: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5

Sofar I tried US 60mm, 80mm, mortar HT, CW 2-inch mortar and mortar emplacement and all worked. Only the mortar emplacement did not fire when I used the attack ground at as much range as possible. I guess the game allows to click a little bit behind the max range and because the mortar cannot move, ...
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 11:55
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5
Replies: 79
Views: 3204

Re: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5

I just tried that - it does. You give them Attack ground order and they start shooting at the position :?
by MarKr
22 Sep 2018, 11:42
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5
Replies: 79
Views: 3204

Re: Blitzkrieg Mod 5.1.5

As for the "mortar barrage should cost ammo" - I am not really against it. Especsially when mortars have the "Attack ground" button which allows you to pretty much keep shelling some location non-stop for free anyway. So perhaps it could be made the way that "normal" sh...
by MarKr
21 Sep 2018, 17:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: What's the point of getting Tigers now?
Replies: 5
Views: 121

Re: What's the point of getting Tigers now?

Tigers will get some changes. They will have more basic accuracy at longer ranges (had less than Panthers) which should help to reduce DPS drops caused by missed shots - it will also make the Tiger a bit more accurate when shooting on the move. They will also receive a bit more basic damage because ...
by MarKr
15 Sep 2018, 11:06
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Airborne HQ Strafe bug
Replies: 7
Views: 140

Re: Airborne HQ Strafe bug

That would be still better than losing it. But i cant remember that it happend in the past that AP upgrade made them disappearing. It would depend on how far into "past" your memory goes. The straffing raid used to use non-AP ammo even after you upgraded your straffing plane with AP bulle...
by MarKr
14 Sep 2018, 20:25
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Airborne HQ Strafe bug
Replies: 7
Views: 140

Re: Airborne HQ Strafe bug

So there seems to be 3 possible bugs regarding this ability. 1. It disappears after first use, 2. It disappears when AP ammo for planes gets upgraded, 3. It disappears once the buildable HQ got build which makes other AB HQ´s losing it. 1) This would need confirming. I haven't found anything that w...
by MarKr
14 Sep 2018, 13:57
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Royal Engineers Buildable MK VII Churchills
Replies: 22
Views: 559

Re: Royal Engineers Buildable MK VII Churchills

Yes, the Mk.VII could be added but still - how effectivelly would you be able to bounce off PaK43 shots? Curently these guns have like 85% chance to penetrate the MkVII (Crocodile) armor at max range and if it stays like that then the MkVII will not be all that useful because PaK43 is present in Def...

Go to advanced search