Search found 182 matches

by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 13:51
Forum: Announcements
Topic: 4.9.9 Patch Preview
Replies: 28
Views: 420

Re: 4.9.9 Patch Preview

- Demolition charges should now destroy any building next to which you plant the charge in one explosion (applies to US Engineers, WM Pios, Storm demo squad, CW Sappers(+RE sappers), Commandos, Sturm pios, Luft Pios) Could you replace US Airborne Engineer's demo ability since that one can't even be...
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 13:33
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Vehicle speeds... Hmm, this is such a controversial topic in BK Mod. But did anyone recently complain about any tank being too slow or too fast??!! As far as I am concerned; No! Therefore I believe that there is really no need to touch the speed of any vehicles. Speeds in BK Mod currently might not...
by Redgaarden
26 Jul 2017, 01:03
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

Whats the point of the Pershing ace? Sure, bit different stats than basic pershing. But what can it provide what Jumbo/jacks/Pershing cant? I mean you say it isnt a good idea. So what exactly gives you an Ace you couldnt do with other units in this doc? Besides that i personally always felt that th...
by Redgaarden
25 Jul 2017, 19:33
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

And I would be happy to see combat engineers in armour doctrine. But I feel a little sad to remove my favourite unit away from infantry doctrine. But I wouldn't mind removing Rangers from the game. Whats your fav unit? Jumbo or 105? If its the 105 i knew that calli jeep would be moved to inf doc. S...
by Redgaarden
25 Jul 2017, 13:16
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)
Replies: 27
Views: 382

Re: Possible Armor doctrine design (Could use Markrs Help)

What are we going to fill the void of infantry doctrine 105 sherman unlock? And also. Could we get some sandbags or something for infantry doctrine regular shermans so they can't be 1hit killed by most axis armour? And I would be happy to see combat engineers in armour doctrine. But I feel a little ...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 02:21
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 37mm AT's
Replies: 10
Views: 90

Re: 37mm AT's

When is the cannister better than the HE? Remember that you can use HE even againts Inf on buildings and shoot like 3-4 times. It would be fine if its just like a 1 shoot hability each time you use it (like in tanks) but this is not the case. I think they wanted to do this before but it didnt happe...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 01:27
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Good example of Armor doc
Replies: 17
Views: 288

Re: Good example of Armor doc

I once tried to use command tank abilities ( not in this game) they cost muni and they should provide timed buffs of various kind, tho i tried the defensive one 3-4 times and i must have been very unlucky cause my tanks still got hit 100% of times. I gives a 0.25 recieved accuracy bonus. When tanks...
by Redgaarden
24 Jul 2017, 01:10
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: 37mm AT's
Replies: 10
Views: 90

Re: 37mm AT's

I prefer HE over cannister since cannister only does 40dmg and has a 80% chance to kill a 0 hp enemy. its all situational, both have their pros and cons over each. I am not saying it happens often, but there has been an occasion where I wish I had the other ability I'm assuming that the "other ...
by Redgaarden
21 Jul 2017, 03:13
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 27
Views: 446

Re: Armor doctrine

Hey panzer, can you give us some stats comparition between E8 and 76W please? I know the gun has 0.75 movement modifier instead of 0.50 and that HVAP deals 5 more dmg (multiplied by 5) than regular 76 it has a bit more hp, used to have 700 I think, but got toned down a bit for some reason. Dont kno...
by Redgaarden
20 Jul 2017, 17:17
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Thats interesting. Isnt it the case that many hate it when all their tanks get all the time wrecked by the rocket arty? And now it shall be only a threat exactly to them. I'm speaking on behalf of the more lighter variants like regular shermans and armored cars that get killed by stray rockets. The...
by Redgaarden
19 Jul 2017, 20:23
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 24
Views: 398

Re: The Artillery Talk

Ive got a whole set of ideas that could make the terror doctrine into a largely rocket artillery focused doctrine with lots of upgrades that could boost them. Including maybe even an upgrade called "increased rocket production" that would lower salvo costs. Also increased rocket artillery...
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 15:52
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1423

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Tiger1996 wrote:
Redgaarden wrote:P.s how do I quote the name of a person? I noticed all my quotes lack the name of the person I'm quoeting.
{quote="example"} text {/quote} :)

But surely use [ ] instead of { } ^^


Thank you. Think I got the hang of it now.
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 12:11
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1423

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Then someone says that Armor doc NEEDS something but you cannot agree on what it is...Shanks says the Armor needs arty, Redgaarden says that Armor desperately needs good infantry and some anti-emplacement and also AA. Really guys I'm saying I dont want more artillery for armour doc and pointing out...
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 01:36
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1423

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

I still prefer the combo of two calli and combat engineers that can blow up bunkers and supporting tanks in the field. I know you have played this mod alot longer than I. But I fail to see how a 2nd calli will help, it already has like half a minut of constant nuisance barrage. Do you really need a...
by Redgaarden
13 Jul 2017, 01:08
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1423

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

I think armour doc is in some desperate need of some good infantry. And some kind of anti emplacement. And they definitely need some kind of anti air, I did test with Tiger before where he had henchels and I had 2 m15 11 shermans of various kinds. the m15 killed like 2 airplanes out of 4 henchel run...
by Redgaarden
12 Jul 2017, 01:48
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1423

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Call ins > Artillery > Emplacements > Heavy tanks > Ligth vehicles > Snipers > Medium tanks > Falls > Infantry > Builders > Rifles. According to my accurate calculations. We can clearly see that armor falls in the "top 3 best companies" catagory at a staggering 3rd spot falling behinde alm...
by Redgaarden
07 Jul 2017, 16:58
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defense > Offense?
Replies: 23
Views: 550

Re: Defense > Offense?

I think Defence bunkers are too hard to take down. The only way I know of is smoke + satchel. I tried Demo charge but pathing and other weird reasons just make it too weird to carry out the order. And I dont think 550 mp is such a big investment at all. People waste alot of resources for stupid reas...
by Redgaarden
03 Jul 2017, 15:00
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Nice 3v3 and, despite being played on Cherburg, almost no arty
Replies: 6
Views: 171

Re: Nice 3v3 and, despite being played on Cherburg, almost no arty

(Minor Spoiler) Those piats were devestating me... And I lost a squad because I threw a nade in the wrong crater :( And entire squad got wiped by arty shell. Other than that I thank you for your compliments. and I will return the favour, You guys played quite well yourselves. Edit: i watched the rep...
by Redgaarden
02 Jul 2017, 22:07
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty
Replies: 17
Views: 349

Re: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty

If you don't spend 100 ammo each time for a maultier salvo i think it would be easier to invest them on nades, and probably one would be enough, then you steal the emplacement and just remove it (can be done even with pios for low mp cost). It sounds good in theory intil you notice in practice that...
by Redgaarden
01 Jul 2017, 20:58
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty
Replies: 17
Views: 349

Re: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty

Apart from 88s, i honestly don't think other emplacements, on both sides, are so impossible to take out without the use of arty, and maybe smoke will be considered a little more, since i almost never seen it used, expecially from axis side. There is a great reason why you dont see smoke that often....
by Redgaarden
26 Jun 2017, 14:14
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Luft Strafe Run
Replies: 2
Views: 193

Re: Luft Strafe Run

Just let it be as it is. I dont think changing anything will do anything for the current balance.
by Redgaarden
24 Jun 2017, 01:26
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Should the 95mm Cromwell stay in RAF doctrine?
Replies: 21
Views: 522

Re: Should the 95mm Cromwell stay in RAF doctrine?

I was kinda against the change in the first palce to add the cromwell 95mm (Did not voice it though) And still feel this way. I literally picked RAF once because I needed good artillery. And as it stands now, RAF gets MUCH better starting arty than Artillery doctrine. I would rahter remove it since ...
by Redgaarden
19 Jun 2017, 20:48
Forum: Ask an Expert
Topic: How to Flank/Close In?
Replies: 4
Views: 168

Re: How to Flank/Close In?

Build enough close range infantry till you kill them at long range.
by Redgaarden
16 Jun 2017, 20:05
Forum: General Discussions on Strategy and Theory
Topic: Help me out! (n00b alert)
Replies: 2
Views: 91

Re: Help me out! (n00b alert)

My advice would be to get used to Brits as I find US to be lackluster in the competetive scene. For early game you use your starting sapper and run it to the middle of the map, then find the closest heavy cover that faces the enemy. Remember that your sappers dont have to build anything and are a st...
by Redgaarden
15 Jun 2017, 23:18
Forum: Player Introductions
Topic: UTC Wehrmacht2007
Replies: 3
Views: 131

Re: UTC Wehrmacht2007

:O

I bid thee wholeheartly welcome.

Go to advanced search