Search found 174 matches

by Redgaarden
21 Jul 2017, 03:13
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor doctrine
Replies: 7
Views: 114

Re: Armor doctrine

Hey panzer, can you give us some stats comparition between E8 and 76W please? I know the gun has 0.75 movement modifier instead of 0.50 and that HVAP deals 5 more dmg (multiplied by 5) than regular 76 it has a bit more hp, used to have 700 I think, but got toned down a bit for some reason. Dont kno...
by Redgaarden
20 Jul 2017, 17:17
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 22
Views: 311

Re: The Artillery Talk

Thats interesting. Isnt it the case that many hate it when all their tanks get all the time wrecked by the rocket arty? And now it shall be only a threat exactly to them. I'm speaking on behalf of the more lighter variants like regular shermans and armored cars that get killed by stray rockets. The...
by Redgaarden
19 Jul 2017, 20:23
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: The Artillery Talk
Replies: 22
Views: 311

Re: The Artillery Talk

Ive got a whole set of ideas that could make the terror doctrine into a largely rocket artillery focused doctrine with lots of upgrades that could boost them. Including maybe even an upgrade called "increased rocket production" that would lower salvo costs. Also increased rocket artillery...
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 15:52
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1348

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Tiger1996 wrote:
Redgaarden wrote:P.s how do I quote the name of a person? I noticed all my quotes lack the name of the person I'm quoeting.
{quote="example"} text {/quote} :)

But surely use [ ] instead of { } ^^


Thank you. Think I got the hang of it now.
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 12:11
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1348

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Then someone says that Armor doc NEEDS something but you cannot agree on what it is...Shanks says the Armor needs arty, Redgaarden says that Armor desperately needs good infantry and some anti-emplacement and also AA. Really guys I'm saying I dont want more artillery for armour doc and pointing out...
by Redgaarden
14 Jul 2017, 01:36
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1348

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

I still prefer the combo of two calli and combat engineers that can blow up bunkers and supporting tanks in the field. I know you have played this mod alot longer than I. But I fail to see how a 2nd calli will help, it already has like half a minut of constant nuisance barrage. Do you really need a...
by Redgaarden
13 Jul 2017, 01:08
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1348

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

I think armour doc is in some desperate need of some good infantry. And some kind of anti emplacement. And they definitely need some kind of anti air, I did test with Tiger before where he had henchels and I had 2 m15 11 shermans of various kinds. the m15 killed like 2 airplanes out of 4 henchel run...
by Redgaarden
12 Jul 2017, 01:48
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Armored doctrine does not work
Replies: 107
Views: 1348

Re: Armored doctrine does not work

Call ins > Artillery > Emplacements > Heavy tanks > Ligth vehicles > Snipers > Medium tanks > Falls > Infantry > Builders > Rifles. According to my accurate calculations. We can clearly see that armor falls in the "top 3 best companies" catagory at a staggering 3rd spot falling behinde alm...
by Redgaarden
07 Jul 2017, 16:58
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Defense > Offense?
Replies: 23
Views: 520

Re: Defense > Offense?

I think Defence bunkers are too hard to take down. The only way I know of is smoke + satchel. I tried Demo charge but pathing and other weird reasons just make it too weird to carry out the order. And I dont think 550 mp is such a big investment at all. People waste alot of resources for stupid reas...
by Redgaarden
03 Jul 2017, 15:00
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Nice 3v3 and, despite being played on Cherburg, almost no arty
Replies: 6
Views: 161

Re: Nice 3v3 and, despite being played on Cherburg, almost no arty

(Minor Spoiler) Those piats were devestating me... And I lost a squad because I threw a nade in the wrong crater :( And entire squad got wiped by arty shell. Other than that I thank you for your compliments. and I will return the favour, You guys played quite well yourselves. Edit: i watched the rep...
by Redgaarden
02 Jul 2017, 22:07
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty
Replies: 17
Views: 342

Re: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty

If you don't spend 100 ammo each time for a maultier salvo i think it would be easier to invest them on nades, and probably one would be enough, then you steal the emplacement and just remove it (can be done even with pios for low mp cost). It sounds good in theory intil you notice in practice that...
by Redgaarden
01 Jul 2017, 20:58
Forum: Matchmaking & Strategies
Topic: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty
Replies: 17
Views: 342

Re: Quick example of why i think not every doctrine should have arty

Apart from 88s, i honestly don't think other emplacements, on both sides, are so impossible to take out without the use of arty, and maybe smoke will be considered a little more, since i almost never seen it used, expecially from axis side. There is a great reason why you dont see smoke that often....
by Redgaarden
26 Jun 2017, 14:14
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Luft Strafe Run
Replies: 2
Views: 190

Re: Luft Strafe Run

Just let it be as it is. I dont think changing anything will do anything for the current balance.
by Redgaarden
24 Jun 2017, 01:26
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Should the 95mm Cromwell stay in RAF doctrine?
Replies: 21
Views: 503

Re: Should the 95mm Cromwell stay in RAF doctrine?

I was kinda against the change in the first palce to add the cromwell 95mm (Did not voice it though) And still feel this way. I literally picked RAF once because I needed good artillery. And as it stands now, RAF gets MUCH better starting arty than Artillery doctrine. I would rahter remove it since ...
by Redgaarden
19 Jun 2017, 20:48
Forum: Ask an Expert
Topic: How to Flank/Close In?
Replies: 4
Views: 165

Re: How to Flank/Close In?

Build enough close range infantry till you kill them at long range.
by Redgaarden
16 Jun 2017, 20:05
Forum: General Discussions on Strategy and Theory
Topic: Help me out! (n00b alert)
Replies: 2
Views: 88

Re: Help me out! (n00b alert)

My advice would be to get used to Brits as I find US to be lackluster in the competetive scene. For early game you use your starting sapper and run it to the middle of the map, then find the closest heavy cover that faces the enemy. Remember that your sappers dont have to build anything and are a st...
by Redgaarden
15 Jun 2017, 23:18
Forum: Player Introductions
Topic: UTC Wehrmacht2007
Replies: 3
Views: 123

Re: UTC Wehrmacht2007

:O

I bid thee wholeheartly welcome.
by Redgaarden
07 Jun 2017, 14:14
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Piat's
Replies: 10
Views: 283

Re: Piat's

But you can just drive away from a piat. Or you can drive straight torwards a piat. The piat is pretty bloody inaccurate that light vehicles could almost be considered a counter to them.
by Redgaarden
26 May 2017, 03:30
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: Demo charges vs bunkers
Replies: 15
Views: 486

Re: Demo charges vs bunkers

3 charges is needed to destroy a bunker, not 20, if you need more than 3 charges it means that we need to fix it.


*raises hands* King tiger needs more than 3 charges. And satchels are wayyyyyy better than demo, the animation is alot shorter so you dont actually die while using the ability.
by Redgaarden
20 May 2017, 16:31
Forum: Bugs
Topic: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
Replies: 25
Views: 729

Re: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine

I think main problem occurs when both H and J are unlocked and "mass producted". From that moment J becomes obsolete, there are really no reason why player should choose J instead of H, given the very little price difference and ammo needed for skirts and so on for the j - One possible so...
by Redgaarden
20 May 2017, 12:43
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW - AT boys commando
Replies: 41
Views: 1085

Re: CW - AT boys commando

The problem is they get outperformed so heavily by all other at guns that having even 2 boys is stil less dmg than a enemy pak gun. And I am just wondering why they are limited to only 2 boys at the time. But if they actually killed their target I woulnd't have to worry all the time how fragile they...
by Redgaarden
19 May 2017, 13:58
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW - AT boys commando
Replies: 41
Views: 1085

Re: CW - AT boys commando

I think their dps is quite low. Seen halftracks run straight past them. And if they could get run over they would.
by Redgaarden
19 May 2017, 11:08
Forum: General - CoH1 / BKMOD1
Topic: New faction
Replies: 4
Views: 420

Re: New faction

Try using the commet. it has chrchill armor and 77mm gun almost like black prince. Just pretend it's a centurion.
by Redgaarden
18 May 2017, 00:37
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW - AT boys commando
Replies: 41
Views: 1085

Re: CW - AT boys commando

Mmh u are talking like boys are bad. I think they are great (and really.not underperforming), and in my opinion the fact that they can shoot 360 degrees, can move fast, reatreat and go again can simply eat all their "cons". 2 boys squad are great either vs vehicles and vs first infantry i...
by Redgaarden
17 May 2017, 10:42
Forum: Bugs
Topic: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine
Replies: 25
Views: 729

Re: [4.9.8]Panzer IV Ausf.J production precondition error for WH Blitzkrieg doctrine

Anyway, If mass production is not required for Ausf.J anymore now, it makes this upgrade become meanless for many player unless you need Stug support upgrade in the bottom of the branch (don't remeber the exact name). Panzer J Quite meaningless after mass production since H starts with skirts and h...

Go to advanced search