Blitzkrieg Mod Forum

Completely understandable.

The Jackson makes me angry enough to do this.

Wald

What’s broken?

Wald

^You don’t have to stream replays, just send the recorded ones that the game makes.

Otherwise, good suggestions.

Wald

This is a Company of Heroes issue for SEGA, not BK. There is the same problem in vanilla.

The BK devs can't do anything about this.

Wald

If players really wanted to play on big maps, they would just close the slots, but it's very rare that someone actually does it. I just want to have two more slots for 2v2 games, since you can't just do the reverse here I do it all the time and people do one of two things: 1) Complain and ask for a...

BK’s meant to be played on bigger maps. One v one’s are meant to be played on vCoH 2v2 maps. Two v two’s are meant to be played on vCoH 3v3 maps. And three v three’s are meant to be played on vCoH 4v4 maps. People play these small maps due to lack of choice and because players choose to play the sam...

viewtopic.php?f=30&t=3689
Wald

Sometimes, Volksturm carry around the Panzerfaust as if he's about to fire it, when doing other actions after firing one.

Here's a picture:
And here's the replay:
Wald

Bug is being looked at by devs.

Wald

Saving replays and rewatching them certainly is key!

That and recon.

Wald

I don't think it'd be problematic, if someone wants to forego barracks and spam jeeps they should be welcome to. It'd be a joke to counter. The only one that might be a bitch to deal with is recrifle jeeps against axis light vehicle openings, but that could be easily solved by giving 20mm's an accu...

Ne, ich lerne seit ungefaehr 13 Jahren Deutsch,

I'm a non-native speaker and haven't had much practice in the last few years.



Wald

I support this too, just get rid of most rewards. There are docs that has this kind of combination (churchill , firefly) so saying that this combination would be too powerfull is just falacy 'cause we had the possibility to do it long time ago. You got a panther? Just aim at the jackson first it ha...

Gepanzerten Unternehmen?

Panzerverstärkungdoktrin?

Panzermitteldoktrin? (Just a joke)

Panzergrenadieredoktrin?

Wald

Playing as BK Doctrine in 5.2.0

Or with Hotchkisses from Jan 2018.

Wald

Make it five. It’s an orgy now, boys.

Wald

Brooooo

well, that stuff had been discussed years ago. No one understood why schrecks are reloading so quickly compared to other weapons like zook and RL rifle. the aim time of two seconds is intentionall and for schrecks as well. Preventing stupid frontal rushes. Some games it feels like their reload time...

This would be an interesting idea.

My big complaint from them is how they often take so long to shoot, followed by reload time.

Wald

I feel like all this would do is the following (from other post): -US would spam 50cal/recrifle jeeps even harder because it can produce 2 simultaneously. I don't believe US would build anything else because it doesn't really rely on a 37mm or eng spam since neither of those units scale in the game...

I edited the title. I think we talked past one another.

Do you still think the same thoughts?

Wald

Would this really make more varied openings or just accelerate tiering? I think it would make more varied openings, rather skip tiering because some T1 units in T1 buildings are unlocked when the T2 Building is built or T2 tech is researched. To get to T3, one still needs to build/research T1+T2. H...

Warhawks97 wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2020, 13:06

agreed.


I would love to have more flexible tec sytems for all factions. I liked the tec system in vcoh actually.



Same btw for supply yard. It should be completely independent and other buildings independent from it.

Yes, this too.

Wald

kwok wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2020, 07:57

What do you mean tier zero units?

I mean HQ units, schwimm/jeep/at gun/opel/deuce

Wald

Alternative Grayhound = Staghound.

Wald