@Red:Yes, commanders get XP in any sector. @CGarr: the thing is that there isn't any room left in UI for LeiG emplacement. I was thinking about an option where Pios would build "empty" emplacements and then you could place into it different types of AT guns from the 28mm HT (possibly even...

I really like this idea.

Wad

Why not drop the price by 50 mp and make healing slighly faster? Then have medics buildable in barracks/HQs for all factions? Then it's a trade off, mobile free, vulnerable healing? Make buildings have to get 12 soldiers for free squad? ^put those in beta patch to test them maybe? ------------------...

Standardization in the sense of, every 37mm is the same with the same target tables, penetration, shell velocity, range, etc. The only variables being the platforms using the 37mm, movement, cover, distance, etc. Makes the game more intuitive to play and less gamey. Just like they did with .50 cals. G

+1 for ammo upkeep idea

would suggest starting at +5. Maybe make it +7 or +10 for non-arty doctrines?

Wald

^DO IT FOR THE MEMEZ

Honestly, I don't have much problems with this WH AT rifle squad.. and the 65 basic range is justified as it can't ambush... Generally, I really can't imagine playing WH without this unit, specifically after the 50.cal buff which makes most Allied vehicles a lot more deadly than they used to be. [s...

Generally, from my understanding, there was a difference in explosive load in rounds fired by guns from AT guns and their respective versions in vehicular turrets to allow the turret to withstand the recoil. More explosive charge = flatter trajectory and more accurate. Less moving parts also means t...

Standardization would be good, though I'd imagine an AT woul be more accurate on the whole than a 37mm mounted on a tank or Grayhound.

Wald

Video is out!

Thanks Tiger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQChAftirY4

I'd actually like the storms to be given the MG42, given that I'd think they'd all be given 'modern' machine guns given the status of their formations, rather than the volksgrenadiers.

G

never seen this myself, will check for it

Why can't fucking shoot a building with a Sherman at max range in DC? I know there's enemy in there. I KNOW IT. BUT I CAN"T FUCKING SHOOT UNTIL IT REVEALS ITSELF WHEN I AM USING DC?!

Better go fuck myself then.

Wald

^Thank you, you as well!

Whore.

Wald

MEFISTO wrote:This is a joke

I'm serious! It was real gameplay!

Wald

After play 4 or 5 games in the BETA, I don't feel like there's much different with Tigers or Pershings. Feels about the same, though I can get the Tigers slightly easier.

And I'd honestly rather an Axis player get Tigers than Panthers. They're easier to kill.

Wald

it really is

PS. Tiger would you please consider shoutcasting this replay? It has a jeep killing a Tiger for Godsakes!

Wald

Extra, extra! Come and geddit! Fresh and hot off the presses! You won't believe your eyes! I didn't until I watched the replay! Feast your eyes on the Jeep that won a medal of honor! Deets: vs. Kwok (Terror) Walderschmidt (Armor) Siegfried (Blitz) NeedAmmo (Infantry Doc) Highlights: At the beginning...

Details: vs. Mencius Moldbug (Armor Doctrine) Kwok (Terror) Major Yser (Royal Engineers) Walderschmidt (Blitzkrieg) Thoughts on it: So far, I barely notice the changes for the Tiger. It comes out a little sooner, which is nice. But ultimately it still doesn't feel spammable as it still costs a bunc...

Warhawks97 wrote:

kwok wrote:And now we got a spammable heavy for an apple and an eye just to make it competetive to units which were supposed to replace/counter the tiger.

^It's not spammable. It still costs 170 fuel. It just comes out a little sooner.

I think you're overreacting.

Wald

Yes. very annoying.

Wald

^You have to pick and choose what parts of the map you focus on. If your opponent catches you offguard, that's a you thing, not a fault of the UI. No game displays the whole map. It's up to you to maintain situational awarness, something you can easily do by pressing the NUM 0 key. Instead of clicki...

If you have a shrek in the trench, you'll be fine. If you have an AT gun overlooking the trench you'll be fine. If you have mines in front of the trench you'll be fine.

There's plenty of ways to deal with this.

Wald

I usually welcome any new map because I'm tired of the same old maps but this map needs a lot fo work.

It's pretty too look at, but there's way too many obstacles that interfere with pathfinding. It makes for some really frustrating games.

Wald