Search found 630 matches

by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 21:23
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 9
Views: 195

Re: [US] Structural changes

What's the reason for these changes? I might personally know but would like it said "outloud" please. The idea is to: Force the axis players to avoid skipping early phases as fast as possible by forcing them to fight longer againts US early vehicles. This would also give some new strategy opens onc...
by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 20:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 9
Views: 195

Re: [US] Structural changes

This is pretty accelerated. The sct car will become buildable at 45 fu or even 30. Meanwhile for WM the first vehicle even being available (not even buildable because of fuel costs) comes at 55 fuel. This feels like people will fall into the "rush 50cal sct car/quad ht" formula. Vehicles available ...
by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 20:00
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 9
Views: 195

Re: [US] Structural changes

This tank could become a light mobile 350 MP tank that can use ambush and mobility. Would in particular be usefull in inf focused docs that need some support with german early medium tanks and light vehicles. A cheap general purpose light tank to support other units when neither sherman nor M10 is ...
by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 17:11
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 9
Views: 195

Re: [US] Structural changes

like it. But why does WSC requires motorpool? Just asking. And could the chaffe be in the Tank depot or available after it? It would cost not more than a stuart in return and these two tanks wouldnt be reward units anymore. - Why does WSC requires motorpool? I needed to add some time into teching w...
by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 02:27
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: [US] Structural changes
Replies: 9
Views: 195

[US] Structural changes

This is my suggestion about structural changes for default US, Units available, new prices, etc. US forces https://i.imgur.com/9sIjMYt.jpg Headquarters Starts with 55 Fuel on HRes Units available: https://media.moddb.com/images/articles/1/36/35818/auto/allies_engineers.gif https://i.imgur.com/cg4jMa...
by mofetagalactica
19 Oct 2020, 00:09
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Armor Doctrine suggestion.
Replies: 4
Views: 93

Re: Armor Doctrine suggestion.

1- Pershing can mantain is CP cost, thats not the problem the US was never designed to have an easy to get heavy tank compared to panther. 2-You say that 2 shermans 75mm are better than a jumbo 75mm in a momment were axis dominate the medium tank phase with stugs and pzF, what would u do with both s...
by mofetagalactica
18 Oct 2020, 20:59
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
Replies: 10
Views: 237

Re: AB Airstrike CP Path

One of the complaints some players have are how doctrines are starting to all look the same. The proposal here seems to be make 82nd more like rangers but with parachutes. Would you make a post around revising tech'ing time if that's how you feel? ---------------------------------------------------...
by mofetagalactica
18 Oct 2020, 19:34
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AB Airstrike CP Path
Replies: 10
Views: 237

Re: AB Airstrike CP Path

Im sorry, but this is a stupid suggestion, current airstrikes are fine as they are. Most of the current problems with AB doc were inf based could be resolved by just reworking the bases of US units, without making huge reworks on the special available units of each doctrine, i would only go as far a...
by mofetagalactica
11 Oct 2020, 21:15
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Problems with PVP in the lobby
Replies: 6
Views: 132

Re: Problems with PVP in the lobby

I still don't see some pvp games.
by mofetagalactica
10 Oct 2020, 17:05
Forum: Bugs
Topic: [5.2.0.] WM illegal units in infantry only
Replies: 1
Views: 54

Re: [5.2.0.] WM illegal units in infantry only

They're commitining crimes of war, wich means is historically realistic.
by mofetagalactica
09 Oct 2020, 00:53
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: What's the point of Volksturm doc?
Replies: 23
Views: 490

Re: What's the point of Volksturm doc?

Yes, it is. The "force retreat" was concidered too brutal as it denied any decision to the opponent and the infantry just always fled. As we plan to make Officers more doctrine-themed anyway, this ability might get replaced by something else in tze future. For the time being you should give it more...
by mofetagalactica
08 Oct 2020, 19:08
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: What's the point of Volksturm doc?
Replies: 23
Views: 490

Re: What's the point of Volksturm doc?

Btw, i don't know if its a bug or not but since propaganda came around now every officer has the same hability that propaganda officer has (reduce moral) but with less range while prop officer has huge range to use it, is this intended?
by mofetagalactica
05 Oct 2020, 21:27
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Teching prices differences between factions
Replies: 4
Views: 138

Re: Teching prices differences between factions

Walderschmidt wrote:
05 Oct 2020, 20:46
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=3689

FD85979D-F5B0-4830-8AEF-69B3FD9A32F7.png

Wald
hahhaha man that post is way better it was buried never saw it, im sorry.
by mofetagalactica
05 Oct 2020, 19:50
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Teching prices differences between factions
Replies: 4
Views: 138

Teching prices differences between factions

cw.png wh.png usf.png pe.png ******* CW ********** (Starts with 50 f on Hres) 150 + 15 f 250 + 65 f 200 + 30 f (600MP + 110 f) <--- captain tier (Only Halftracks/Staghounds available) 200 + 90 f (800MP + 200 f) <--- cromwell/Sherman 75mm tier (Noice right? lol) 300 + 70 f ---------- 1100MP + 270 f ...
by mofetagalactica
04 Oct 2020, 21:33
Forum: Bugs
Topic: CW ROYAL ARTY CHURCHILL
Replies: 1
Views: 103

CW ROYAL ARTY CHURCHILL

Fix the requirements currently it says that you need captain+command cromwell, too much teching for the earliest churchill, don't know if its a bug or intended.
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 21:15
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Infantry Doctrine - Both Reward Tanks Available
Replies: 15
Views: 243

Re: Infantry Doctrine - Both Reward Tanks Available

There are docs that has this kind of combination (churchill , firefly) so saying that this combination would be too powerfull is just falacy 'cause we had the possibility to do it long time ago. Talking of falacies - this sort of comparison is a falacy called "Undistributed Middle" which falls into...
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 19:58
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW support truck and captain.
Replies: 5
Views: 141

Re: CW support truck and captain.

I think the only change here you're suggesting is 50cal AA HT available and add tetty right? Otherwise the rest it true already. What is the difference between having the Tetty vs the Daimler though? Why does the tet need to be available? The daimler actually has a better gun (wow I just noticed th...
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 19:46
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Infantry Doctrine - Both Reward Tanks Available
Replies: 15
Views: 243

Re: Infantry Doctrine - Both Reward Tanks Available

I support this too, just get rid of most rewards. There are docs that has this kind of combination (churchill , firefly) so saying that this combination would be too powerfull is just falacy 'cause we had the possibility to do it long time ago. You got a panther? Just aim at the jackson first it has...
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 19:36
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AT Teams. (US)
Replies: 6
Views: 131

Re: AT Teams. (US)

I would just suggest to find a common ground for the reload time and just standarize it across the board for every faction, you don't need a fucking degree to reload a rocket launcher.
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 19:28
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: WH blitz doctrine ammo per res trades
Replies: 4
Views: 100

Re: WH blitz doctrine ammo per res trades

Isn't the cost of the trade supposed to be the "draw back"? The ratio doesn't have to be 1:1. Doesn't manpower blitz still exist? And wouldn't this just be doubled up with the assault unit call in spam for more P3/storm spamming? I think I won a 1v1 just using that.... granted he wasn't a super goo...
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 06:57
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: WH blitz doctrine ammo per res trades
Replies: 4
Views: 100

WH blitz doctrine ammo per res trades

I would suggest to swap places of the fuel trade with Manpower trade, just to delay the powerspike that gives in teching wich makes stugs came waaaaay to early into the field.
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 06:53
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: CW support truck and captain.
Replies: 5
Views: 141

CW support truck and captain.

I think the units available from the support truck at default should be changed since currently after using a lot of resources and time spent into getting your next truck you're only able to get a 57mm HT when all other Factions and even US is able to get more stuff available for less resources and ...
by mofetagalactica
24 Sep 2020, 06:39
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: Kar 98 stats beta to live version.
Replies: 5
Views: 115

Kar 98 stats beta to live version.

So after playing the beta from the first changes to live version, my suggestion is to change back the values of Kar 98 to old values, having in mind that Kar98 stats was one of the first changes that went trough the beta, without contemplating the upcoming changes that went trought the last phases o...
by mofetagalactica
18 Sep 2020, 19:05
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: AS Pershing for inf Doc
Replies: 20
Views: 372

Re: AS Pershing for inf Doc

Hello, im pretty much againts any pershing in more doctrines, changes were made to make doctrine good at everything but excel at a certain scheme/theme that the doctrine is about, wich means it should still have heavy tanks able to deal with other heavy tanks wich is why jackson was added into inf. ...
by mofetagalactica
18 Sep 2020, 16:16
Forum: Balancing & Suggestions
Topic: New update feedback
Replies: 9
Views: 221

Re: New update feedback

@MarkR Patrol was a kind of click to kill, but with removing it the doc should have received something in return. Now its just plain bad against any kind of armor, not to mention the absurd nerf of 101s (who came up with the idea to swap BAR upgrade to garands lol?). So far, all docs are pretty goo...